Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Study to investigate less-invasive fish swabbing technique
The new technique involves gently stroking a swab (sterile cotton bud) along the flanks of the fish whilst the fish is held in a net.

Project to explore ways to improve fish welfare 

A University of Leicester scientist is set to investigate ways to improve the welfare of fish used in scientific research.

Dr William Norton from the University’s Department of Neuroscience aims to test the theory that swabbing has a significantly lower impact on stress-related behaviour and physiology than fin clipping.

“In this project, we will investigate the nature and magnitude of any welfare benefits of swabbing over fin clipping, explained Dr Norton. “Such information is essential to validate the swabbing technique and assure its wider adoption by the growing community of researchers that use fish as laboratory models.”

It is common practice for laboratories to collect DNA samples from fish. It is mostly done to confirm the genetic strain of fish, their population of origin, or whether an individual contains genes that are relevant to the research.

Typically, DNA sampling is performed by fin clipping, an invasive procedure carried out under non-terminal anaesthesia. A recent study found that of the estimated 3,250 zebrafish laboratories worldwide, 85 per cent use fin clipping to collect DNA.

The new technique involves gently stroking a swab (sterile cotton bud) along the flanks of the fish whilst the fish is held in a net. The process takes seconds and researchers have already confirmed that it collects enough DNA for analysis.

“While swabbing appears to be less invasive than fin clipping, it still requires fish to be netted, held in the air and handled; procedures that could potentially cause stress,” Dr Norton continued. “Therefore, the potential of swabbing as a refinement to standard DNA collection by fin clipping remains untested.”

Dr Ioanna Katsiadaki, a principal investigator at Cefas and an expert in the assessment of fish welfare, will collaborate on the project and provide state-of-the-art facilities for the less-invasive measurement of stress hormones released naturally by fish into the water through their gills.
 
The project, 'Quantifying the potential of skin swabbing as a refinement for DNA sampling of laboratory fish', will be funded by the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research.

Image (C) University of Leicester

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
BVA urges 'continued vigilance' over bluetongue

The British Veterinary Association (BVA) has urged vigilance following a concerning rise in Bluetongue (BTV) cases in sheep and cattle.

In a recent statement, the BVA noted that members are reporting more severe clinical signs and higher mortality rates than in previous years.

'We know that farm vets are working hard to support farmers and animals affected by this outbreak, during what is an extremely difficult time for all involved,' they stated. 'Continued vigilance to identify disease early is vital and vaccination remains the best way of protecting animals from this disease.'