Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Unique study compares how bat and human cells respond to viruses
bat
"By doing this we are at the beginning of understanding why these viruses are so dangerous to us and so benign to bats."
Fruit bats carry viruses which can be dangerous to humans but are benign to bats

Scientists from the University of Bristol, together with CSIRO's Australian Animal Health Laboratories (AHHL) have been using cutting edge techniques to comprehensively compare the response of bat and human cells to a highly dangerous bat virus.

This is the first time that scientists have been able to study how cells from these two species respond to the same virus on a side-by-side basis.

The research focusses on the bat-borne Hendra virus which, like the Ebola virus, is not dangerous to bats but very dangerous to humans and some other animals.

In the study, the team at AAHL infected human cells with the Hendra virus and studied how the virus affects genes and proteins in the infected cells. At the same time, they also infected bat cells with the same virus and studied how the they responded.

Using a supercomputer, the research team identified about six thousand genes and proteins made by the bats and examined how they changed in response to the Hendra virus. A similar analysis was also carried out on the human cells.

The scientists found that human and bat cells respond very differently to the same virus. The bat cells responded robustly and quickly to the infection, triggering biochemical pathways that are known to be potentially helpful in other virus infections.

Conversely, the human cells were slower to respond to the virus. This indicates that human cells take longer to realise there is an infection and trigger the biochemical pathways that might protect someone from the infection becoming fatal.

Dr Michelle Baker, who headed the team at AAHL, said: "As with all fundamental scientific work there is a long way to go but we have shown how to compare two different animals (bats and humans) side by side and look at how thousands of genes and proteins respond to the same bat virus.

By doing this we are at the beginning of understanding why these viruses are so dangerous to us and so benign to bats. Indeed the kind of bat cells we use in this experiment are from a similar type of fruit bat as those which harbour Ebola virus in Africa."

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Charities' XL bully neutering scheme closes

News Story 1
 A scheme that helped owners of XL bully dogs with the cost of neutering has closed to new applications due to high demand.

The scheme, run by the RSPCA, Blue Cross, and Battersea, has helped 1,800 dogs and their owners after XL bullies were banned under the Dangerous Dogs Act.

In England and Wales, owners of XL bully dogs which were over one year old on 31 January 2021 have until 30 June 2024 to get their dog neutered. If a dog was between seven months and 12 months old, it must be neutered by 31 December 2024. If it was under seven months old, owners have until 30 June 2025.

More information can be found on the Defra website. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Avian flu cattle outbreak spreads to tenth US state

Cattle in two dairy herds in Iowa have tested positive for highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), making it the tenth state in the USA to be affected by the ongoing outbreak of the disease in cattle.

Since March 2024, more than 80 herds across the USA have been affected by the virus and three dairy workers have tested positive. Authorities have introduced measures to limit the spread of the virus and farmers have been urged to strengthen their biosecurity protocols.

Mike Naig, Iowa secretary of agriculture, said: "Given the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza within dairy cattle in many other states, it is not a surprise that we would have a case given the size of our dairy industry in Iowa.

"While lactating dairy cattle appear to recover with supportive care, we know this destructive virus continues to be deadly for poultry."