Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Improved animal health could address climate crisis, research reveals
Parasites, mastitis and lameness all contributed to the emissions burden.
Poor animal health leads to increased greenhouse gas emissions.

New research from a collaboration of 16 global researchers has revealed the climate impact of poor farm animal health.

The group, including veterinary professionals, scientists and ecologists from 14 institutions and three continents, sought to address the climate impact of farm animals without reducing livestock animals or food production.

The findings suggest that poor health among farm animals, including infection and disease, could be contributing to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Common, low-grade infections and production diseases, such as parasites, mastitis and lameness, were considered accountable for a large part of the emissions burden.

However, the researchers say that, because these health issues are so common, they are not being tracked as closely as more high-profile disease outbreaks.

This means that these lower grade infections and diseases are also poorly represented when assessing GHG emissions.

Although there have been effective initiatives implemented to reduce emissions through improved animal health, they are often not acknowledged or measured in national inventories. This means that they might not receive the backing they need to continue being effective.

The researchers recommend that, through better focus and measurement of animal health, farmers and policymakers can significantly reduce GHG emissions without reducing food production.

The group says that a rigorous methodology is needed to estimate farm animals’ GHG emissions and the achievable benefits that improved health could lead to. They have developed a framework to quantify the relationship between animal health and GHG emissions and to account for positive action.

They suggest that this approach will not only tackle climate change, but also lead to cost-effective food production and enhanced animal welfare.

Frances Ryan, a co-author of the study, works at the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Sciences’ Centre for Supporting Evidence-Based Interventions in Livestock (SEBI-Livestock).

Dr Ryan said: “Livestock are crucial to livelihoods around the world and play an especially important role for food security, and the provision of nutrient-dense food in the global south.

“Reducing emissions by improving animal health allows us to address environmental issues while protecting people who rely on livestock.”

The full study can be found in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.