Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Most adverse drug reactions unreported, study finds
The researchers also want regulators to make reporting quicker and easier.
Researchers urge vets to report suspected cases.

Veterinary professionals are being encouraged to report suspected adverse drug reactions, after a new study found that the vast majority were not reported.

Researchers from the University of Liverpool reviewed more than 10,000 electronic health records from the Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET). They found 827 cases of suspected adverse drug reactions, of which around 90 per cent went unreported.

Heather Davies, lead author of the study, explained: “It has long been thought that adverse drug reactions are under-reported. This work used real world evidence from first opinion practice to be the first publication that confirms this suspicion.”

Free-text clinical narratives of consultations stored in SAVSNET were screened for the phrases ‘adverse drug reaction’ and ‘side effect’.

The researchers then analysed the records to determine the seriousness and expectedness of the reaction, the suspected product, and whether it had been reported to the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) or the relevant marketing authorisation holder.

Most of the cases involved dogs and 70 per cent were listed as ‘expected’. Reactions which were not expected were more likely to be reported. The study also found that there was no correlation between the clinical severity of the reaction and how likely to was to be reported.

Dr Davies added: “As adverse drug reaction reporting rate is directly linked to the regulator's ability to mitigate safety issues, this paper is a call to arms encouraging all veterinary professionals to report suspected adverse drug reactions and regulators to make reporting quicker and easier.

“It also the highlights the promise that big real-world data sets hold in enhancing drug safety monitoring processes.”

The study, which received funding from BSAVA PetSavers and the VMD, has been published in the Journal of Small Animal Practice.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Annual submission deadline small pet animal exemptions

News Story 1
 Companies marketing medicines for small pets exempt from authorisation must submit their annual return to the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) by 30 November 2026.

Submitting this annual return ensures continued compliance with regulatory requirements for products marketed without a full Marketing Authorisation. The exemption specifically applies to products intended for animals, cage birds, terrarium animals, small rodents, ferrets and rabbits.

For further details and submission guidelines, visit the gov.uk website.  

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Bluetongue RZ extended across Scotland

The Scottish Government has announced an extension to a Bluetongue Restricted Zone that is in place in south-west Scotland.

From 3 October, the Restricted Zone will be extended to cover the whole of Scotland. The Animal, Plant and Health Agency (APHA) says this is in response to further disease spread, as well as simplify trading conditions ahead of the autumn.

Since the whole country will share a disease status, it will no longer be necessary to have a movement license to move susceptible livestock around the country. Restrictions on germinal products remain.

As of 1 October 2026, there were 1,979 cases of BTV-3 in England, 389 cases in Wales and 40 cases in Scotland.