Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Testing reduces need for routine treatment of liver fluke, study finds
"By listening to the science, we have been able to make informed decisions about when to treat our livestock" - Stuart Lamont
Farmers urged to ‘test, don’t guess’ to benefit animal and environmental health.

A new seasonal study carried out on the Scottish island of Islay has revealed that regular monitoring of liver fluke infection can enable farmers to treat animals only when necessary. This will benefit animal and environmental health as well as helping to reduce flukicide resistance.

For the study, monthly monitoring of blood and faecal samples taken from a select group of animals showed that the timing of liver fluke infection has changed, which researchers say is partly due to changes in weather patterns.

Prophylactically treating animals for liver fluke has led to the overuse of flukicides and increased resistance. This has resulted in a reduction in the number of working products available in the veterinary toolkit.

Stuart Lamont, a farmer involved in the study, found low levels of liver fluke in the summer and autumn and was advised to move treatment to January. He had previously been treating his animals at set times of the year.

Mr Lamont said: “By listening to the science, we have been able to make informed decisions about when to treat our livestock, which has led to benefits for animal welfare, as well as significant chemical savings.

“I’m now not having to unnecessarily handle my sheep to run them through a race every six weeks and by treating more sparingly, it means the products are more likely to work when we need to use them.”

The study was done in collaboration between Moredun Research Institute, Elanco Animal Health, RSPB and Islay farmers, as part of the RHASS Presidential Initiative (PI), exploring the science behind food and drink production. The work has resulted in a plan to plan to boost animal welfare, reduce flukicide resistance, improve soil health and help promote local wildlife populations.

Moredun parasitologist, Philip Skuce added: “There is increasing pressure on the agricultural industry to reduce chemical usage and the most simple and effective way to do this is to ‘test, don’t guess’ and with patterns of parasite epidemiology shifting, more than ever scientists need to be monitoring these changes and bringing farmers along with us.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.