Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Organisations respond to CMA working papers
BVA says that the CMA must fully understand nuances in the sector.
Vet groups have shared their preliminary responses.

A number of veterinary groups have published preliminary responses to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) working papers.

The CMA released six working papers on 6 February, assessing the evidence it has gathered and the group’s emerging views. External research papers have also been shared on the case page.

Preliminary responses to the CMA’s working papers have already been published by leading veterinary organisations, including the British Veterinary Association (BVA), Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) and the Federation of Independent Veterinary Practices (FIVP).

BVA, RCVS and FIVP have each individually welcomed the CMA’s recognition of the contributions of individual veterinary surgeons and veterinary nurses. In their overview document, the CMA said it commended veterinary professionals’ ‘dedication and commitment to pet owners’.

The CMA’s findings included a survey, in which 88 per cent of pet owners agreed that their veterinary surgeons and veterinary nurses offered the highest standard of care to their pets.

There was also mutual agreement from the organisations on the CMA’s comments on the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966. The inquiry group stated that the legislation had not kept up with changes in the industry, particularly changes to the ownership of practices.

This was well-received by all three organisations, with RCVS’ response stating: “We are acutely aware that the regulatory workarounds we have needed to put in place over recent years to compensate for this outdated legislation, such as our voluntary Practice Standards Scheme and the Veterinary Client Mediation Service, can only go so far until such times as new legislation is enacted by parliament.”

However, in their preliminary responses, the organisations have raised some concern about the limitations of the CMA inquiry’s findings.

BVA’s response flags the importance of the CMA inquiry group understanding the nuances of the veterinary sector. It particularly references key services such as out of hours treatment and referrals, and its hopes that future remedies do not lead to a reduction in choice for clients.

FIVP business development manager Rita Dingwall said: “The CMA clearly have been listening to concerns raised by FIVP and others and in their overview document appear to understand the complex nature of the veterinary sector.

“The overarching consideration in this process is animal welfare and FIVP will continue to press this point in the many nuances of the investigation.”

BVA, FIVP, BSAVA and BVNA will present full evidence to the CMA at a formal hearing in March.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Prof Joanne Webster elected as Fellow of the Royal Society

News Story 1
 Joanne Webster, a professor of parasitic diseases at the RVC, has been elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS).

An infectious disease expert, Prof Webster is known for promoting a One Health approach to disease control.

She completed her doctoral research in zoonotic disease and parasite-host interactions, and has since earned widespread recognition for contributions to parasitology and global health.

Prof Webster said: "I am truly honoured, and somewhat stunned, to be recognised alongside such an exceptional group of scientists." 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Germany FMD import restrictions eased

The UK government has lifted the import restrictions placed on FMD-susceptible commodities from Germany.

The decision comes after the country was recognised as foot-and-mouth disease free without vaccination on 14 May.

Imports of FMD-susceptible animals and their by-products from Germany were originally banned, after the country reported a case of FMD near Brandenburg in January. In March, the UK government permitted imports from outside of the outbreak zone.

Germany will now be able to import FMD-susceptible animals and their by-products into the UK, providing they meet other import conditions.

The decision follows rigorous technical assessment of measures in Germany. Defra says it will not hesitate respond to FMD outbreaks.