Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Ponds contaminated with harmful pet parasite treatments
Some ponds tested for over 20 times the threshold harmful for wildlife.
Study suggests more awareness needed among dog owners.

A study led by Imperial College London has revealed the contamination which dogs can cause by swimming in ponds.

Researchers discovered high levels of the pesticides imidacloprid and fipronil in several ponds at Hampstead Heath where dogs were permitted to swim.

Imidacloprid and fipronil are pesticides found in common flea and tick treatments used as a preventative measure on both dogs and cats. They were banned for agricultural use in 2018 due to their toxicity to bees and other insects.

However, there is now increasing concern that their use on pets is leading to environmental pollution, with these chemicals reaching the environment through household wastewater and dogs swimming in natural waters.

To investigate the impact that dog swimming has on environmental pollution, the team studied six ponds and six connecting streams in London’s Hampstead Heath. Hampstead Heath is known to have good biodiversity and is home to many rare and threatened species.

Researchers, including scientists from Imperial College London and the Royal Veterinary College, tested three ponds which dogs were allowed to swim in, three they were not, and the streams which connected to them.

In the ponds where dogs were permitted to swim, water analysis revealed the average concentrations of imidacloprid and fipronil to be 309 ng/L (nanograms per litre) and 32 ng/L respectively. This is over 20 times the thresholds recognised as harmful to invertebrate wildlife.

Where dogs were not permitted to swim, however, water analysis detected no imidacloprid or fipronil.

To assess how well the dangers of parasiticide contamination were understood, the team followed this up with a survey of 101 dog owners who had brought their dogs to Hampstead Heath.

The survey revealed that 86 per cent did not know that parasiticides could cause environmental harm. A third of respondents were also unaware that many parasiticides warn that dogs should not swim or be washed within a few days of treatment.

However, 94 per cent said they believed that protecting nature should be an important consideration when choosing treatments.

Lauren Yoder, from the Royal Veterinary College, said: "Dog owners can play an important part in reducing the overall impact on the water that dogs enjoy by checking if they really need to use these products.

“If more owners moved to a 'when needed' approach, then this parasiticide pollution could be reduced."

The full study can be found in the journal Science of the Total Environment.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

New guidelines published for wildlife disease surveillance

News Story 1
 A set of international guidelines for disease surveillance in wildlife has been updated for the first time since 2015.

Released by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and the World Organisation for Animal Health, General Guidelines for Surveillance of Diseases, Pathogens and Toxic Agents in Free-ranging Wildlife is designed to help wildlife authorities and others working with wildlife carry out effective surveillance programmes.

The document, which cover areas including choosing appropriate strategies, safety and biosafety protocols, and ethical and legal considerations, can be read here.  

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Farmer survey to reveal on-farm impact of bluetongue

A nationwide survey has been launched to better understand how the bluetongue virus is affecting UK farms.

Results will inform the support that farmers receive for bluetongue, as well as preparing the livestock industry for the future.

The short online survey is open to all livestock farmers, regardless of whether they've had a confirmed case of bluetongue on their farm. It asks how many animals have been affected, the severity of their clinical signs and how it has impacted farm business.

The survey takes five minutes to complete and is fully anonymous.

It is led by Fiona Lovatt, of Flock Health Limited, and the Ruminant Health & Welfare bluetongue working group, in collaboration with AHDB and the University of Nottingham.

Dr Lovatt says: "We need to find out what level of clinical signs farmers are seeing in their animals, whether they are experiencing mortality with BTV-3 cases, and what their appetite is to vaccinate in future for bluetongue serotype 3."

The survey can be found here.