Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Review calls for sea turtle monitoring
All seven species of sea turtle are seeing population declines.
The Dick Vet says immediate action is needed.

A review from the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies has called for immediate action to safeguard sea turtle populations.

The researchers found that critically endangered turtles, such as the Kemp’s ridley and the hawksbill, were significantly underrepresented in monitoring studies. They also raised concern for the flatback sea turtle, which currently has no assessed conservation status due to the lack of monitoring data.

The research team reviewed more than 600 publications, spanning four decades, to consider the population monitoring efforts for sea turtle species.

Although conservation efforts are ongoing to protect the sea turtle, the findings highlight an immediate need to protect the animal. All seven species of sea turtle are seeing population declines.

Researchers are therefore pushing for population monitoring data to better inform conservation policies. This includes increased monitoring in Southeast Asia and Northern and Central Africa, where sea turtle populations are poorly understood.

Sea turtle population monitoring is usually managed using field-based methods, such as satellite tracking and nest surveys.

However, researchers say that genetic approaches are being underutilised in sea turtle population monitoring. They believe that this could ensure a higher genetic diversity, so turtle species can adapt to environmental changes.

The data from these studies could play an important part in updating official species assessments for the Red List of Endangered Species.

Despite evidence of significant population declines, some turtle species have not had updated assessments for over 15 years. The flatback turtle has not been assessed since 1996.

The research team say that it is urgent that there is international cooperation and collaboration with local communities to protect sea turtles, and therefore their local marine ecosystems.

Haley Hendrix, MSc student and first author, said: “The findings of this study serve as a call for immediate efforts to conserve sea turtle populations and safeguard the oceans they inhabit.

“Failure to address the identified gaps in sea turtle population monitoring could jeopardise not only these iconic marine animals but also the health and functioning of entire marine ecosystems.”

The full study can be found in the journal Diversity.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

BEVA gives RVNs right to vote

News Story 1
 The British Equine Veterinary Association (BEVA) is to allow its registered veterinary nurse (RVN) members the right to vote.

RVN members will now be able to take part in key decision-making processes and stand for BEVA council.

Marie Rippingale, chair of BEVA's Nurse Committee, said: "I am very proud to be a part of BEVA.

"This change will help to empower nurses to speak up and contribute, but more importantly, it will give them an opportunity to collaborate with other members of the equine veterinary profession to bring about change that is positive for all." 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Bluetongue vaccines comparison table produced for vets

The Ruminant Health and Welfare Group has produced a comparison table on the vaccines available in the UK for bluetongue virus serotype 3.

The three vaccines, which have been permitted for use by the secretary of state for environment, food and rural affairs, claim to reduce symptoms rather than prevent animals from catching the disease.

The table looks at a range of different factors for each vaccine, including their use in sheep and cattle, their use during pregnancy, adverse events, and storage requirements.

The comparisons have been compiled by Flock Health in collaboration with the British Veterinary Association, the British Cattle Veterinary Association, the Sheep Veterinary Society, the British Deer Veterinary Association, the British Camelid Association, and the Goat Vet Society.

The comparison table, and further information on the bluetongue vaccines, can be accessed here.