Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Scientists challenge health claims of vegan dog diet study
“By revisiting and further interrogating these data, we have been able to draw more nuanced insights” – Prof Barrett-Jolly.
Authors of new study claim that original conclusion “was not accurate”.

Scientists at the University of Liverpool have challenged the findings of a study which its authors claimed showed that a nutritionally-sound vegan diet is the healthiest diet for dogs.

Reinvestigating data from the original study, first published in 2022, Alex German and Richard Barrett-Jolley of the University of Liverpool concluded that the claim the authors made in favour of vegan diets was not backed up by the data.

The original study was among the first large-scale studies into the impact of vegan diets on dog health, surveying 2,639 dog owners about their pets’ diets and health. The findings, according to the study’s authors, showed that nutritionally-sound vegan diets are healthier and less hazardous for dogs than conventional meat and raw meat diets.

However, this conclusion has now been disputed. Prof German explained: “On first reading this paper in 2022, it was evident that the study exclusively relied upon owner survey data and had an observational design, meaning that the associations between diet type and dog health could only suggest a possible correlation and not causality.

“In other words, it was not accurate to conclude that ‘Nutritionally-sound vegan diets are the healthiest and least hazardous choices for owners to feed their pet dogs.’”

“Further, the statistical analyses used did not explore the effect of possible confounding from other variables, such as the age and breed of the dogs and owner variables including age, gender, education and diet.”

Prof German and Prof Barrett-Jolly conducted their own statistical analyses on the original dataset, focusing on owner opinions of dog health. They found that these owner opinions were most strongly associated with the age of the dog. Other variables, such as owner age and breed size, also featured.

In contrast, the researchers found that the association between a vegan diet and owner opinions of health was minimal.

Prof Barrett-Jolly added: “We know how seriously owners take their pet’s health. By revisiting and further interrogating these data, we have been able to draw more nuanced insights.

“Crucially, we cannot draw a firm conclusion as to what diet type is actually best for dogs; this was never possible given the nature of the original dataset and study design. However, we can conclude that variables other than dog diet are more strongly associated with owner opinions about the health of their dog.”

The new paper has been published in the journal PLOS ONE, which also published the original study.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

FIVP launches CMA remedies survey

News Story 1
 FIVP has shared a survey, inviting those working in independent practice to share their views on the CMA's proposed remedies.

The Impact Assessment will help inform the group's response to the CMA, as it prepares to submit further evidence to the Inquiry Group. FIVP will also be attending a hearing in November.

Data will be anonymised and used solely for FIVP's response to the CMA. The survey will close on Friday, 31 October 2025. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
CMA to host webinar exploring provisional decisions

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is to host a webinar for veterinary professionals to explain the details of its provisional decisions, released on 15 October 2025.

The webinar will take place on Wednesday, 29 October 2025 from 1.00pm to 2.00pm.

Officials will discuss the changes which those in practice may need to make if the provisional remedies go ahead. They will also share what happens next with the investigation.

The CMA will be answering questions from the main parties of the investigation, as well as other questions submitted ahead of the webinar.

Attendees can register here before Wednesday, 29 October at 11am. Questions must be submitted before 10am on 27 October.

A recording of the webinar will be accessible after the event.