Vets urged to address canine behavioural problems
A recent report has highlighted the need for changes in the way vets deal with canine behavioural problems. The study by Roshier and McBride, used a "fly-on-the-wall" approach to observe discussions between clients and vets during annual vaccination consultations.
As part of the study, 17 consultations were videoed in two small animal practices in the UK. The consultations involved six veterinary surgeons, 17 owners and 17 dogs. Clients also completed a questionnaire after their consultation.
A total of 58 behaviour concerns were raised across the study, of which only 10 were discussed during consultations. None however were fully explored or managed beyond the consultation. It was noted by researchers that during the consultations, which on average lasted 9 minutes, a range of subjects were brought up, including medical, husbandry, behaviour and cost. All of these topics were led by the vet, except for behaviour.
Roshier and McBride also noted that owners used a variety of sources to acquire welfare information, for example regarding diet, vaccinations and breeding. It was found that owners did not always seek the advice of a vet, particularly when looking for information on mental wellbeing, suitability of purchasing an animal, and training and behavioural problems.
Commenting on the findings, Roshier and Mcbride referred to the lack of discussion on behaviour as "regrettable". The report states: "Generally, the longer a behaviour problem exists, the more established it becomes and the more difficult it is to change. This is particularly so for those behaviours involving fear and/or aggression.
"Additionally, the owner's bond with the animal is likely to be so damaged that relinquishment or even euthanasia is the favoured option." Researchers advocate that vets employ "good questioning and listening skills and gain the client's trust to aid disclosure of difficult to discuss topics." Other recommended measures include asking clients to complete a questionnaire before consultations, and including behaviour assessments in each patient's record.
The findings of the study have resulted in calls from some to improve the way in which vets are trained, enabling them to better handle client concerns regarding behaviour. Of the 6 vets in the study, only 2 had been trained in veterinary behaviour or behavioural medicine, and only one offered behavioural consultations. It has been suggested by some that the issue of handling behaviour should be included in veterinary curriculums, as a large percentage of vets are not sufficiently comfortable with their knowledge of behavioural medicine to deliver appropriate care.
The study has highlighted the dichotomy between somatic healthcare and medical healthcare, and researchers have urged vets to address behavioural concerns with the same rigour as they would health concerns. The report by Roshier and McBride concludes: "Assessment of an animal's behaviour in various situations should be an integral part of veterinary examination."
RCVS' Mind Matters Initiative (MMI) has launched round two of its veterinary mental health research grants.
