Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel
BVA responds to criticism
Association justifies its views on anthelmintic resistance

Criticisms have been voiced over the British Veterinary Association's (BVA) call to reclassify all anthelmintics as POM-V – a decision that would prevent suitably qualified persons (SQPs) from prescribing them.

Two organisations that represent SQPs  – Animal Health Distributors Association (AHDA) and Animal Medicines Training Regulatory Authority (AMTRA) – immediately questioned the BVA's view.

Sheep and cattle are increasingly resisting anthelmintic products, which are used to destroy parasitic worms. A situation that is causing significant concern among those in the veterinary and farming industry.

As such, the BVA suggests that the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) should reclassify anthelmintics to allow only vets to prescribe such products.

Following criticism, the association has further justified its view with a statement.

"The BVA''s position on the classification of anthelmintic products has been several years in the making. The situation is [now] so severe that we believe we must act now or face the consequences of newer classes of anthelmintics becoming ineffective.

"At BVA Congress in 2009, Professor Neil Sargison of the Royal (Dick) University made the case for all anthelmintics to be made POM-V… and, in consultation with our specialist species divisions and members, we developed our current policy position.

"Of course we do understand that this position will be difficult for those that represent and train SQPs to support. We are not seeking to place blame and the BVA does acknowledge the efforts of AHDA and AMTRA to improve the training of SQPs and introduce compulsory CPD.

"But all of us working within the current system should take responsibility for the current situation and consider how best to change the way we operate in future.

"Unfortunately, in our opinion, the existence of a VPS category has allowed the distribution of anthelmintics on a far wider scale that has put pressure on these products, and ultimately increased the likelihood of resistance."

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
New form for online veterinary medicines retailers

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has produced a new online form for retailers wishing to sell veterinary medicines on the internet.

The form replace the previous Word version and is part of the VMD's ongoing commitment to digitise its processes. Anyone retailing prescription medicines online, including POM-V, POM-VPS and NFA-VPS categories, is lawfully required to register with the VMD before trading.

The change only applies to new applicants. Retailers already listed on the VMD's Register of Online Retailers or registered under the Accredited Internet Retailer Scheme (AIRS) do not need to do anything.