Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel
Getting to know Tom Lonsdale
A determined candidate standing for RCVS Council. 

Tom Lonsdale graduated from the Royal Veterinary College in 1972 and afterwards established a four location mixed practice in Sydney, Australia.

Tom has been an active voice in the veterinary world since the 1980s when he developed an interest in pet food. In 2001, he published Raw Meaty Bones and has continually stood for RCVS Council in the hope of passing on his message to the veterinary community.

When asked about the RCVS and his election hopes, he gave the following response, outlined below:

1. The McKelvey report identified serious deficiencies at the RCVS that are not satisfactory for a professional body. What would you change?

Unless and until there's a complete overhaul of the vet establishment the 'old boys' club will continue on its incompetent and muddle-headed way.
    
2. The RCVS has been accused of being disconnected from its members. What do you think can be done to improve this?

Hold a full parliamentary enquiry leading to a new Veterinary Surgeons' Act.

3. How would you restore trust in the RCVS, if elected?

  • Trust in the RCVS, as it now stands, can never be achieved.
  • The RCVS Council is made up of 12 representatives from the universities, whose strings are pulled by the junk pet food companies and pharmaceutical companies.
  • Of the 24 councillors elected in the sham elections, mostly they are drawn from the associations and establishment practices.
   
4. How can the RCVS become more transparent in the future and what part would you play in this?

I believe that by standing for election and gaining approximately 10% of the vote each year for 15 years I've contributed significantly in the call for greater transparency, integrity and accountability of the veterinary establishment.

5. After closing its VN awarding body the RCVS introduced a significant "regulatory fee" for student nurses, which has been viewed by some as grossly unfair. What is your opinion?

Don't know sufficient detail to comment.

6. In the current climate of de-regulation and reducing costs, what cuts would you advise in RCVS expenditure and activities ?


Tinkering and cost cutting will not save the RCVS. If convening a Parliamentary enquiry and new Veterinary Surgeons Act will take too long, then I suggest an administrator be appointed to oversee and clean up the RCVS pending the necessary major reforms.
I believe that as a profession we've got little to lose and much to gain by a complete unrestricted review of the profession in all its aspects. We must regain sight of the fact we are here to serve animals, animal owners and the wider community.

For Tom's full response, click here.

His manifesto is accessible here.
   


 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.