Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel
Doubts about badger cull surface
Advisors warn cull could be counterproductive and illegal

Advice on the effectiveness and legality of the proposed badger cull pilot programs given to the government by Natural England has been published after a Freedom of Information request by the Labour Party. Specifically, the advice raises the possibility that the culls could result in a legal challenge on grounds of breaching a European-level wildlife treaty, kill tens of thousands of badgers, and accidentally worsen the spread of bovine tuberculosis (bTB).

The advice warns that the government's preferred choice of 'free-shooting', which was chosen on grounds of reduced expense, may not prove sufficient for controlling the badger population and may even backfire as surviving badgers roam further afield than usual to escape - thus spreading bTB to new areas. Natural England's advice also projected that if 40 areas of approximately 350 square kilometres are cleared for culling in the fullness of time, "the cumulative maximum [badger deaths] that might be reached under the policy is about 90,000 to 130,000 in total".

Of more immediate concern is the possibility that such a cull might breach Articles 8 and 9 of the Bern Convention. The animal charity Humane Society International (HSI) has already announced that it will be seeking a judgement on whether the proposed cull breaches the Convention, which charges that governments "shall prohibit... the use of all means capable of causing local disappearance of, or serious disturbance to, populations of a species."

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

FIVP announces third series of Practice Matters

News Story 1
 The Federation of Independent Veterinary practices (FIVP) has announced a third season of its podcast, Practice Matters.

Hosted by Ian Wolstenholme, series three will focus on the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) investigation, including a discussion about some of the expected impacts on independent veterinary colleagues.

Episode one launches on 13th January with guests Drs David Reader and Scott Summers, who will draw on their research into the CMA investigation and provide insights into themes such as transparency, pricing and consumer trust.

Ian Wolstenholme said: "In its third series, we will try and hone in on what the changes will mean in reality for independent practices with advice and guidance on implementation and delivery, drawing on the experience of our own team and other experts in the profession. Hope you can join us soon!" 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Survey seeks ruminant sector views on antimicrobial stewardship

A new survey is seeking views of people working in the UK ruminant sector on how to tackle the challenge of demonstrating responsible antibiotic stewardship.

Forming part of a wider, collaborative initiative, the results will help identify the types of data available so that challenges with data collection can be better understood and addressed.

Anyone working in the UK farming sector, including vets and farmers,is encouraged to complete the survey, which is available at app.onlinesurveys.jisc.ac.uk