Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel
Pet Care Trust Responds to Consultation
The Pet Care Trust has welcomed the Consultation on Dangerous Dogs published by Defra but is concerned that the proposals for compulsory microchipping and insurance will create unnecessary burdens on the vast majority of pet owners who do behave responsibly.

Commenting on the consultation, Janet Nunn, chief executive of the Pet Care Trust said:  “There are merits in insuring and microchipping your dog, but making this compulsory would have the effect of penalising responsible pet owners – and potentially criminalising those who are financially vulnerable. The costs involved could be devastating for those in low income households, meaning that some would have to consider giving their pets up or having them put to sleep. Why should the behaviour of a small irresponsible minority mean that an older person living alone with just their harmless pet for companionship has to foot a bill for microchipping and insurance – or risk losing their pet? Many dog owners will comply with the proposed legislation whilst the irresponsible few will not and will thus avoid the costs involved. There has to be a better way of tackling the problem.

“Whilst the Trust supports microchipping (as stated in our submission to the Bateson inquiry) and believes it is the best way of identifying a dog, we do not believe that it should be made mandatory for all. The present legal requirement for dogs in public to wear a collar and tag showing the owner’s name and address is perfectly serviceable for the vast majority of dogs and their owners. Whilst microchipping is desirable, it would be disproportionate to criminalise those who cannot afford to comply. We also fail to see the necessity of annual checks on microchipped dogs, which would make this even more costly for the pet owner.

“As for pet insurance, most responsible owners insure, but we shouldn’t criminalise those who choose not to. Every dog owner has a duty of care to their animal and a responsibility to society, but it would be wrong to allow a few bad elements to hinder the benefits that 8 million dog owners in the UK enjoy. Dogs are good for your health: research shows dog owners (especially pensioners) make fewer visits to the doctor, experience lower levels of stress and have lower blood pressure and cholesterol levels than non pet owners. There is also evidence to suggest that young people particularly benefit physically, emotionally and socially from living with dogs and learning about responsible pet ownership. These benefits to society (and the NHS) should not be overlooked.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Birmingham Dogs Home makes urgent appeal

News Story 1
 Birmingham Dogs Home has issued an urgent winter appeal as it faces more challenges over the Christmas period.

The rescue centre has seen a dramatic increase in dogs coming into its care, and is currently caring for over 200 dogs. With rising costs and dropping temperatures, the charity is calling for urgent support.

It costs the charity £6,000 per day to continue its work.

Fi Harrison, head of fundraising and communications, said: "It's heart-breaking for our team to see the conditions some dogs arrive in. We really are their last chance and hope of survival."

More information about the appeal can be found here

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Avian flu confirmed at premises in Cornwall

A case of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 has been detected in commercial poultry at a premises near Rosudgeon, Cornwall.

All poultry on the infected site will be humanely culled, and a 3km protection zone and 10km surveillance zone have been put in place. Poultry and other captive birds in the 3km protection zone must be housed.

The case is the second avian flu case confirmed in commercial poultry this month. The H5N5 strain was detected in a premises near Hornsea, East Riding of Yorkshire, in early November. Before then, the disease had not been confirmed in captive birds in England since February.

The UK chief veterinary officer has urged bird keepers to remain alert and practise robust biosecurity.

A map of the disease control zones can be found here.