Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

UK public ‘overestimate’ dog laws, study finds
Dog owners appeared confident about laws, but were not accurate when questioned.
Respondents thought stronger protections were in place.

A new study has suggested that the general public may not fully understand the UK’s legal protections for dogs.
 
Research, conducted by the University of Stirling, found that participants often believed the UK had stronger dog ownership laws than actually exist.
 
More than 1,700 people across the UK partook in the survey, which explored how changing attitudes towards dogs might shape public expectations and knowledge of dog legislation. The study addressed dog owners and those who did not own dogs.
 
Participants were challenged on their knowledge of 22 current, nation-specific and hypothetical dog laws. These responses were analysed using multinomial statistical models to identify patterns across demographic groups.
 
Dog owners were consistently found to be more confident that they understood the legislation related to dogs, but they were not more accurate. 
 
For example, 85 per cent believed that aversion training methods had already been banned. Meanwhile, only 16 per cent knew that there was no legislation to explicitly prohibit the euthanasia of healthy dogs.
 
More than half of all respondents did not know that strict bans on shock collars apply only to Wales, while less than half knew there were laws against dogs causing fear or apprehension in a private home.
 
Sarah Weir, a psychologist at the University of Stirling, said: “These findings challenge common assumptions about legal awareness and responsible ownership, showing that while dog owners are often expected to understand and comply with the law, they are no more accurate in their knowledge than non owners.
 
“This raises concerns about how legal understanding can be improved when people are unaware their knowledge is inaccurate.”
 
She added: “The research also suggested that differences in legal knowledge may be linked to broader social change. Younger participants were more likely to assume that stronger legal protections for dogs and owners already existed, which may reflect the increasingly elevated status of dogs in society.”
 
The full study can be found in the journal Animals.

Image © University of Stirling

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
BVA urges 'continued vigilance' over bluetongue

The British Veterinary Association (BVA) has urged vigilance following a concerning rise in Bluetongue (BTV) cases in sheep and cattle.

In a recent statement, the BVA noted that members are reporting more severe clinical signs and higher mortality rates than in previous years.

'We know that farm vets are working hard to support farmers and animals affected by this outbreak, during what is an extremely difficult time for all involved,' they stated. 'Continued vigilance to identify disease early is vital and vaccination remains the best way of protecting animals from this disease.'