Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Practices ‘in limbo’ amid IVC Evidensia legal threat
IVC Evidensia gave practices until 31 December 2025 to cease use of the phrase.

The group claimed wordmark over ‘Pet Health Club’ a year ago.

Independent practices have been left ‘in limbo’ after receiving legal threats from IVC Evidensia over a year ago, a support group has said.

In letters to dozens of practices, IVC Evidensia claimed wordmark over the term ‘Pet Health Club’ and demanded practices cease use of the term.

The letter, issued by IVC chief medical officer Gudrun Ravetz and legal counsel Alice Holt, described the term as ‘a trading name of Independent Vetcare Limited’. It claimed that it had built goodwill and reputation in the United Kingdom.

A follow-up letter gave independent practices a deadline of 31 December 2025 to act upon IVC Evidensia’s demands. However, since the deadline passed, none of the practices have received any further communications from the veterinary group.

IVC Evidensia’s first legal letter prompted the formation of a support group, We Are Spartacus, where affected practices could unite against the threats. Within days the website received hundreds of supporters.

Dr Natalie Morris-Webb, owner of Malthouse Vets, said: “Although IVC appears to have ceased defending the ‘pet health club’ wordmark, with none of the affected practices reporting any further correspondence for many months, the uncertainty is still there.

“It’s unacceptable that IVC has not yet achieved a commercial settlement, or revealed whether they have given the industry a reprieve and no longer plan to take legal action.”

An IVC Evidensia spokesperson has responded, stating: "We have no current plans to approach anyone we haven’t previously contacted on this matter, but of course, we reserve the rights available to the company, as trademark holder, to protect our trademarks and customers in the future, as in any sector."

"A material number of those previously infringing our trademark have now updated their branding. Anyone still in breach was given clear notification, so the position is unambiguous - they are required to update.”


Meanwhile, We Are Spartacus has reported separate legal processes being enacted by IVC Evidensia.

The large veterinary group has been registering a number of wordmarks, common phrases and trademarks, including the phrase ‘It’s not what we do, it’s why we do it’. It has also registered ‘IVC inspiring veterinary care’, which We Are Spartacus suggests could be confused with RCVS’ strapline, ‘inspiring confidence in veterinary care’.

A spokesperson from We Are Spartacus said: “Now IVC is attempting to trademark the words ‘inspiring vet care’, so there’s a possibility that the RCVS is now in Gudrun and Alice’s sights, due to the similarities with its strapline.

“If this is the case, we’d welcome the RCVS to join We Are Spartacus. Hundreds of those that registered on our website weren’t affected by the legal letters, but they still wanted to show their support and stand alongside everyone that has had to contend with IVC’s threats. There’s no doubt this support and solidarity from the wider veterinary industry would extend to the RCVS as well, should they need it."


IVC Evidensia’s trademark application can be viewed online.

Image © Shutterstock.com/Indypendenz

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.