Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Carbon footprint of dog food revealed by study
Pet owners are advised to research the meat cuts in their dog's food.
Wet, raw, and meat-rich products had the highest greenhouse gas emissions.

A study has revealed that some dog foods produce a larger carbon footprint than human foods.

It has been estimated that the production of dog food ingredients in the UK contributes to approximately one per cent of the country’s total greenhouse gas emissions.

Researchers from the University of Edinburgh and the University of Exeter examined the ingredient and nutrient labelling information of almost 1000 commercially available dog foods. This was used to calculate their carbon footprints, based on the emissions which were generated during the production of ingredients.

The test sample included a selection of dry, wet, and raw foods, as well as plant-based and grain-free options.

It is estimated that producing these foods for dogs worldwide would produce greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to half of those emitted from commercial flights each year.

There was a notable difference between the environmental impact of different commercial dog foods. The highest impact products were responsible for up to 65 times more emissions than the lowest rating options. 

Products which used large amounts of prime meat were found to be increasing the industry’s emissions. Meanwhile those using nutritious carcass parts, which are in low demand, helped to limit environmental impact.

Dry food, which was not marketed as grain-free, also had a lower impact than wet, raw or grain-free options.

Researchers recommend that dog owners that want to reduce their environmental impact should consult the label description of the meat cuts used in the food. Products which have a lower content of prime cut meats will also have a lower carbon footprint.

John Harvey, from the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, said: “As a veterinary surgeon working on environmental sustainability, I regularly see owners torn between ideals of dogs as meat‑eating ‘wolves’ and their wish to reduce environmental harm.

“Our research shows just how large and variable the climate impact of dog food really is. It’s important for owners to know that choosing grain-free, wet or raw foods can result in higher impacts compared to standard dry kibble foods.

“The pet food industry should make sure meat cuts used are of the types not typically eaten by humans, and that labelling is clear.”

The full study can be found in the Journal of Cleaner Production.

Image © Switlana S/Shutterstock.com

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.