Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Parasite prevention protects over five million infections annually - study
Flea prevention alone was found to save households around £32.2 million each year.

Research is the first to quantify the full health and economic impact of routine treatment. 

Routine parasite prevention can protect pets from more than five million infections a year, according to new research.

The landmark study conducted by experts from Kreavet, the University of Nottingham, ESCAPP and ESCAPP UK & Ireland, also found that current protection methods could save UK households around £53 million in veterinary costs – and with optimal coverage, this increases to £95.2 million.

Writing in Parasites and Vectors, the authors describe how they used data on treatment usage, parasite prevention and associated costs to model infection outcomes across current and “optimal compliance” scenarios. In the optimal scenario, they found the number of prevented infections could rise by 70.6 per cent, reaching 9.3m annually.

The analysis assessed the impact of routine control measures against fleas, ticks, roundworms and lungworms in companion animals. It revealed that 2.3 million flea infestations and more than two million tick infestations are avoided each year in UK dogs and cats.

Flea prevention alone was found to save households around £32.2 million each year through avoided veterinary treatments and home decontamination costs.

Professor Hany Elsheikha, head of ESCCAP UK & Ireland, said: “This study provides the first national quantification of how many infections and infestations routine parasite control prevents in UK pets each year. Our modelling shows that preventive treatments make an important contribution to animal health, public health and household finances.

“By improving our understanding of the effects of parasite control on pet health, we can prevent more infections every year, reducing the risks for animals and families and the pressures on veterinary services.”

The research also notes that parasite infections are increasing, with expanding tick and lungworm populations. Inconsistent owner compliance remains a barrier to parasite control.

Professor Elsheikha added: “While our study highlights substantial health and economic benefits of preventive parasite control, it’s crucial that we continue to undertake research that helps the veterinary and pet communities understand how preventive care protects not only pets, but the people around them.

“At the same time, ongoing work is needed to better understand environmental pathways and to promote the sustainable, risk-based use of parasiticides.”

Image (C) Anastasiya Tsiasemnikava/Shutterstock.com 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.