Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

RVC identifies dogs at most risk of tail injury
The most common breeds to have a tail injury are boxers, English springer spaniels and cocker spaniels.
The boxer was one of the breeds at greatest risk.

The Royal Veterinary College (RVC) has revealed the dog breeds which are at the most risk of having a tail injury.

The study, led by the RVC’s VetCompass Programme, also explores how often these injuries occur and how veterinary practices are approaching the care of dogs which have tail injuries.

Dogs’ tails play an important role in their daily lives, helping them with communication, balance, and scent marking. A tail injury can disrupt these essential natural behaviours and have serious welfare risks, causing pain and distress for dogs.

Researchers examined clinical records from random samples of 285 tail injury cases, as well as 285,000 controls, from a population of over 2,000,000 dogs in veterinary care in 2019.

The findings found that approximately 1 in 435 of all dogs in UK will present for veterinary care each year. The most common breeds to have a tail injury are boxers, English springer spaniels and cocker spaniels.

In contrast, the French bulldog, with its congenitally shortened tail, was less likely to have a tail injury.

When compared to breeds that are not recognised by the Kennel Club, working dogs and gundogs were at a higher risk of tail injury. Meanwhile dogs in the ‘toy’ group had a reduced risk.

Research also revealed that brachycephalic dog breeds were at a reduced risk of tail injury compared to mesocephalic dog breeds.

The treatment of tail injuries saw pain relief and antibiotics prescribed in 45.6 per cent and 32.6 per cent of cases respectively. Surgical amputation was performed in 9.1 per cent of cases.

Camilla Pegram, lecturer of veterinary epidemiology at the RVC, said: “This study has used the power of “big data” to robustly address the frequency, risk factors and clinical management of tail injuries in dogs.

“Not only are tail injuries painful, but they can also affect how dogs communicate and interact with the world around them. With tail docking no longer a routine practice, our findings highlight the dogs that may benefit from closer owner monitoring - particularly during high-energy activities.”

Dan O’Neill, associate professor in companion animal epidemiology, said: “Having a long happy tail to wag must be one of the greatest natural joys in any dog’s life. 

“Although this new paper shows that tail injuries are relatively uncommon in dogs overall, owners of very active types of dogs such as boxer, English springer spaniel and cocker spaniel should be aware of their increased risk and try to reduce trauma to these dog’s tails.”

The full study can be found in the journal Veterinary Record.

Image © CL-Medien/Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.