Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Study reveals benefits to laparoscopic ovariectomy
The findings support existing research on the benefits of laparascopic procedures.
The surgery has fewer complications and unusual behaviours.

A new study has revealed benefits to laparoscopic ovariectomy over an open ovariohysterectomy when neutering female dogs.

Researchers suggest that a laparoscopic ovariectomy (LAP-OVE) procedure resulted in fewer postoperative complications and unusual behaviours when compared to the more traditional open ovariohysterectomy via celiotomy (OVH-CEL).

The project, part-funded by BSAVA PetSavers, saw researchers from the University of Nottingham, Guide Dogs and Feldon Veterinary Centre collaborate to compare the procedures. The research team analysed statistics from 519 bitches which were neutered by either LAP-OVE or OVH-CEL at four UK veterinary practices.

Researchers sought to review retrospective data on both the perioperative and postoperative outcomes in dogs undergoing each of the procedures.

The findings revealed a lower rate of wound redness or swelling at the surgical site following a LAP-OVE compared to an OVH-CEL. Statistics showed that 16 per cent of LAP-OVE patients experienced redness and swelling compared to 36 per cent of OVH-CEL patients.

Dogs neutered by LAP-OVE also appear to be less likely to encounter intraoperative complications, with two per cent of dogs neutered by LAP-OVE seeing such issues compared to three per cent of those neutered by OVH-CEL. Similarly, post-operative complications were recorded at 0.5 per cent in the LAP-OVE group and one per cent of the OVH-CEL group.

There was also evidence that unusual behaviours, such as inappetence or discomfort, appeared less often in dogs which had been neutered by LAP-OVE.

Researchers say that this supports existing research, which finds that laparoscopic procedures in general will have fewer postoperative complications than open surgery when performed by an experienced veterinary surgeon.

Rachel Moxon, lead author of the study, said: “While there is already evidence from other studies relating to complications following neutering surgeries in bitches, this is the first time that the outcomes have been compared between what are anecdotally reported to be the two most frequently performed neutering surgeries for female dogs in the UK.

“The results will be of interest not only to vets, but for pet owners and others that have to make choices about neutering their dogs. Understanding the surgical risks is an important factor to consider, and decision making is made easier when it can be informed by evidence.”

The full study can be found in the Journal of Small Animal Practice.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.