Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

FIVP and SPVS release joint CMA remedies response
(Caption here)
The groups say remedies will have a ‘negative impact’ on independent practices.

The Federation of Independent Veterinary Practices (FIVP) has collaborated with the Society of Practising Veterinary Surgeons (SPVS) to respond to the CMA’s suggested remedies.

The joint response investigates the CMA’s working papers from the perspective of independent practices, concluding that these practices would see a ‘disproportionately negative impact’.

The report reveals ‘critical concerns’ from FIVP and SPVS members about the remedies. The submission outlines arguments against the remedies and proposes alternative solutions that could be implemented.

FIVP and SPVS have particularly highlighted the burden that implementing potential requirements would have on smaller practices. Among the CMA’s suggested remedies are mandatory prescriptions and detailed price comparisons.

Their response notes how this might impact independent practices, including an administrative overload and reduced profitability. The groups say that this could lead to increased costs for clients.

They have also warned against an over-emphasis on price transparency in the CMA’s remedies.

The groups suggest that the CMA’s focus on price transparency could contribute to the erosion of the ‘vet-client-pet’ relationship. They say that, despite independent practices’ core values, mandated price transparency risks turning veterinary care into a ‘purely transactional interaction’.

FIVP and SPVS state that they remain supportive of the CMA’s goals of increased transparency and client choice.

They say that they advocate for client education and choice, and approve efforts to ensure fairness for independent practices. Through a survey of SPVS and FIVP members, the organisations found that many supported the development of a Client Information website that would guide clients to get the best for their pets from their veterinary practice.

The response has called for any changes to be introduced through a phased approach to help independent practices through the transition.

Rita Dingwall, chair of FIVP, said: “This joint effort highlights the unique position and challenges faced by independent veterinary practices in light of the proposed remedies.
 
“Together, we have worked diligently to articulate the critical role that independent practices have in providing tailored high-quality care for our communities.”

The full response can be read here.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.