Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Bigger animals have increased cancer risk, study confirms
Elephants' rapid evolution has meant they have managed to reduce their cancer risk.
Findings challenge belief that there is no link with size.

A study has challenged long-standing theories by revealing that larger animals do have an increased risk of developing cancer.

The findings challenge the idea of ‘Peto’s paradox’: a theory from 1977 that suggested that there was no correlation between animal size and cancer risk.

The new study saw researchers from three universities collaborate to examine cancer data from 263 species. This was spread across the four major animal groups: amphibians, birds, mammals and reptiles.

The data had been gathered from veterinary autopsies of 31 amphibians, 79 birds, 90 mammals and 63 reptiles. Using advanced statistical methods, researchers analysed the relationship between cancer rates and body sizes, while taking into account the different species involved.

Researchers discovered that, overall, bigger animals displayed a higher prevalence of benign and malignant tumours.

This finding proved to be consistent in all species, regardless of whether they naturally stop growing (birds and mammals) or grow throughout their lives (amphibians and reptiles).

However, the researchers also identified that rapid evolution was a contributing factor to cancer defence. Animals which have rapidly evolved to a large size over short evolutionary timescales also evolved improved mechanisms to control cell growth and prevent tumours.

This means that, despite being ten times bigger, elephants have approximately the same cancer risk as a tiger.

There were some outliers to the researchers’ theory though, where a subset of species had much more or much less cancer than expected for their body size.

The common budgie, which weighs less than 30g, was found to have cancer rates which were more than 40 times higher than expected for its body size. The naked mole rat, however, had almost no recorded rate of cancer.

Advances in modern medicine means that researchers were unable to apply this theory to humans.

Overall, the research revealed a trend of larger species recording higher cancer rates. However, it also highlighted the role of evolution in developing mechanisms for cellular defence.

George Butler, lead author of the research at University College London, said: “Finding which animals are naturally better at fighting off cancer opens exciting new paths for research.

“By studying these successful species, we can better understand how cancers develop and potentially discover new ways to fight the disease. This could lead to breakthrough treatments in the future."

The full study can be found in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.