Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Bigger animals have increased cancer risk, study confirms
Elephants' rapid evolution has meant they have managed to reduce their cancer risk.
Findings challenge belief that there is no link with size.

A study has challenged long-standing theories by revealing that larger animals do have an increased risk of developing cancer.

The findings challenge the idea of ‘Peto’s paradox’: a theory from 1977 that suggested that there was no correlation between animal size and cancer risk.

The new study saw researchers from three universities collaborate to examine cancer data from 263 species. This was spread across the four major animal groups: amphibians, birds, mammals and reptiles.

The data had been gathered from veterinary autopsies of 31 amphibians, 79 birds, 90 mammals and 63 reptiles. Using advanced statistical methods, researchers analysed the relationship between cancer rates and body sizes, while taking into account the different species involved.

Researchers discovered that, overall, bigger animals displayed a higher prevalence of benign and malignant tumours.

This finding proved to be consistent in all species, regardless of whether they naturally stop growing (birds and mammals) or grow throughout their lives (amphibians and reptiles).

However, the researchers also identified that rapid evolution was a contributing factor to cancer defence. Animals which have rapidly evolved to a large size over short evolutionary timescales also evolved improved mechanisms to control cell growth and prevent tumours.

This means that, despite being ten times bigger, elephants have approximately the same cancer risk as a tiger.

There were some outliers to the researchers’ theory though, where a subset of species had much more or much less cancer than expected for their body size.

The common budgie, which weighs less than 30g, was found to have cancer rates which were more than 40 times higher than expected for its body size. The naked mole rat, however, had almost no recorded rate of cancer.

Advances in modern medicine means that researchers were unable to apply this theory to humans.

Overall, the research revealed a trend of larger species recording higher cancer rates. However, it also highlighted the role of evolution in developing mechanisms for cellular defence.

George Butler, lead author of the research at University College London, said: “Finding which animals are naturally better at fighting off cancer opens exciting new paths for research.

“By studying these successful species, we can better understand how cancers develop and potentially discover new ways to fight the disease. This could lead to breakthrough treatments in the future."

The full study can be found in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Prof Joanne Webster elected as Fellow of the Royal Society

News Story 1
 Joanne Webster, a professor of parasitic diseases at the RVC, has been elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS).

An infectious disease expert, Prof Webster is known for promoting a One Health approach to disease control.

She completed her doctoral research in zoonotic disease and parasite-host interactions, and has since earned widespread recognition for contributions to parasitology and global health.

Prof Webster said: "I am truly honoured, and somewhat stunned, to be recognised alongside such an exceptional group of scientists." 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Germany FMD import restrictions eased

The UK government has lifted the import restrictions placed on FMD-susceptible commodities from Germany.

The decision comes after the country was recognised as foot-and-mouth disease free without vaccination on 14 May.

Imports of FMD-susceptible animals and their by-products from Germany were originally banned, after the country reported a case of FMD near Brandenburg in January. In March, the UK government permitted imports from outside of the outbreak zone.

Germany will now be able to import FMD-susceptible animals and their by-products into the UK, providing they meet other import conditions.

The decision follows rigorous technical assessment of measures in Germany. Defra says it will not hesitate respond to FMD outbreaks.