Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Research links cancer in birds to clutch size
Scientists suggest this may be an 'evolutionary trade-off' between reproduction and survival.
Birds that laid more eggs had higher rates of cancer.

Research conducted by an international group of scientists has suggested a relationship between birds’ reproductive rates and their risk of cancer.

The study, one of the largest on cancer susceptibility across bird species, discovered that birds which laid more eggs per clutch tended to have higher rates of cancer than those reproducing less.

Although it is investigated in many mammals, cancer in birds has been less extensively studied. The research team from Arizona State University analysed over 5,700 bird necropsies across 108 avian species.

The researchers suggest that the relationship between reproduction and cancer susceptibility could highlight the ‘evolutionary trade-offs’ between reproduction and survival for the birds. They believe that this could be related to energy allocation, as reproducing limits the amount of energy available.

Like all other organisms, birds have limited energy resources that must be allocated across various functions. This means that, when more energy is focused on reproduction, there is less energy available for maintaining health.

Since some birds have high reproductive rates, and invest heavily in raising offspring, they may have less energy available for DNA repair – making them more susceptible to cancer.

These findings may also explain why some long-lived species which have fewer offspring and can invest more in self-maintenance have lower cancer rates. Meanwhile, species with higher reproductive rates and shorter lifespans may focus their energy on reproduction.

In contrast to expectations, the study did not identify a strong correlation between body size or lifespan and cancer risk.

This represents a phenomenon in biology known as ‘Peto’s paradox’. Although larger, longer-lived animals have more cells which could become cancerous, they still display lower cancer rates.

Stefania Kapsetaki, co-first author of the study, said: "It is interesting that depending on the reproductive trait that we focus on, the trade-off between reproduction and bodily maintenance is not always clear.

"For example, investing in a trait linked to increased reproduction does not always mean less investment in a trait linked with bodily maintenance.

"It is important to bear in mind that patterns of avian cancer prevalence are affected by multiple interacting components, some known and others yet to be discovered."

The full study can be found in the journal Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.