Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

WSAVA condemns cosmetic alteration of pets
“Elective surgeries should not be performed simply to alter an animal’s appearance or behaviour based on human preferences or tradition” – Heather Bacon.
The organisation has published a new position statement on the issue.

The World Small Animal Veterinary Association has issued a position statement expressing its opposition to the physical alteration of an animal’s body for either cosmetic reasons or to control behaviour.

Prepared by the WSAVA’s Animal Welfare Committee (AWC), it is hoped that the statement will support veterinary teams and organisations in preventing and discouraging practices including onychectomy, devoicing, tail docking, and ear cropping.

Although such procedures are illegal in many countries, they still continue to be performed. In the UK, for example, it is legal to import a dog with cropped ears. Organisations such as the British Veterinary Association have argued that this has created a loophole which has allowed ear cropping to become popular among some owners.

The statement argues that such procedures ‘demonstrate a lack of recognition of the intrinsic value of animals as sentient beings and sends the message that they are commodities to be altered and exploited in line with the preferences of people.’

The WSAVA is asking veterinary teams to help educate clients about the harm that cosmetic and behavioural-control procedures can cause.

Heather Bacon, chair of the AWC, said: “Elective surgeries should not be performed simply to alter an animal’s appearance or behaviour based on human preferences or tradition. A robust cost-benefit analysis and application of the evidence is always necessary to ensure the best health and welfare outcomes for our companion animals.

“All veterinarians have an ethical obligation to act in the best interests of their patients. We can all improve animal health and welfare outcomes by demonstrating leadership and evidence-based practice on these contentious issues, and by proactively engaging with communities to normalise and promote the value of healthy cats and dogs with intact toes, ears, tails and voices. We hope our position statement will support colleagues around the world in achieving this.”

The position statement can be read here.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.