Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Study adds to evidence for dehorning black rhinos
“In an ideal world no one would want to remove arguably one of the most iconic features of a rhino" - Lucy Chimes, University of Bristol Veterinary School.
The procedure is carried out to protect species from poaching.

A new study has found no evidence that dehorning has a negative impact on black rhinos.

Black rhinos are listed as a critically endangered species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), with poaching for their horns posing a constant threat to their survival.

A number of African country reserves now dehorn rhinos to act against poaching, yet few studies have explored the impacts of the process, particularly among the black rhino species.

Building on previous knowledge of population growth between dehorned and horned rhinos, researchers examined four sub-populations of black rhino in Namibia. Of these, three populations had undergone some form dehorning at least once, and one population had never been dehorned.

Specifically, the team measured the age of females at the birth of their first calf; average time between the birth of calves for each female; birth sex ratios, calf survival, life span and cause of death.

Their study revealed no statistically significant differences in key factors of population growth between dehorned or horned black rhinos - a finding that is encouraging for the continued use of dehorning as an anti-poaching technique.

It has previously been suggested that dehorning rhinos could impact upon their biology and behaviour, either through losing their horns or from the dehorning process itself - which requires the animal to be sedated. 

The study was led by researchers at the University of Bristol, together with the Save the Rhino Trust and the Namibian Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism.

Lucy Chimes, former MSc student from the University of Bristol Veterinary School, said: “In an ideal world no one would want to remove arguably one of the most iconic features of a rhino, its horn, but unfortunately this is not an ideal world and relentless poaching has forced many reserves to resort to dehorning.

“Our study found there were no statistically significant differences in any of the measures of population productivity evaluated between dehorned and horned rhinos, which is reassuring for the use of dehorning as an anti-poaching deterrent in black rhinos.”

The study, ‘Effects of dehorning on population productivity in four Namibia sub-populations of black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis bicornis)’, is published in the
European Journal of Wildlife Research.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.