Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

New study explores impact of pets on loneliness
"Companion animals provided a much-needed source of purpose." - Heather Clements.

It considers the positive impact of pet ownership over the COVID-19 pandemic.

A recent study from the University of West Scotland has examined the links between companion animal ownership, loneliness and wellbeing throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Led by researchers from the university, and supported by the Waltham Petcare Science Institute, the large-scale study used an embedded mixed-methods design, with a qualitative component embedded within the larger quantitative study.

Findings showed that the cross-sectional data showed no association between pet ownership and loneliness, however, qualitative findings discovered that pet owners believe that the association exists. 

Published in Animals, the open-access journal, the study, entitled 'Companion Animal Type and Level of Engagement Matter', demonstrated that many pet owners perceive psychological and emotional benefits from their relationship with their pets, and that this perception may translate into a closer bond pets, and potentially improved mental well-being and loneliness. 

Of the 1199 participants, those who kept companion animals overwhelmingly rated them as having a positive effect on their well-being during the pandemic, with 85 per cent of dog owners and 75 per cent of cat owners surveyed believing that their pets had an extremely or moderately positive effect on them. 

Fewer dog and cat owners, 10 per cent and 20 per cent respectively, believed that their pet had a slightly positive effect or no effect at all, whilst fish owners were fairly evenly split across all four of these categories. Only a small minority or participants rated their pets as having a negative effect on their wellbeing.

Heather Clements, PhD student on the study, commented on the findings: “Despite being physically isolated from friends, family or colleagues, having a pet meant never truly being alone.

“Companion animals not only helped to take their guardians’ minds off negative thoughts associated with the pandemic, but also provided a much-needed source of purpose.”

Several of the participants suggested that their companion animal provided a source os purpose and positive distraction. Recognising their responsibility to their pets, they continued daily routines of walking and feeding times to provide structure for their pet, therefore adding structure to the participant's day and allowing them to experience a facet of normal life throughout the pandemic.

The watching of ornamental fish was frequently cited in the survey as being a welcome distraction, however they were perceived as having a less positive effect than cats or dogs, potentially due to the lack of comfort through physical touch.

Researchers acknowledge that while many participants indicated that their companion animal positively impacted their wellbeing over the COVID-19 pandemic, the duration of the study was limited to a two week period.

Further long term studies are needed to provide insight into the longevity of these effects and how transient they may be.

Darren Logan, head of research at the Waltham Petcare Science Institute, commented: “Identifying the specific aspects of keeping companion animals that were beneficial during the pandemic will allow researchers to develop and test more theories regarding the impact of the human-animal bond for people and animals alike.” 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets to run marathon for World Animal Protection

News Story 1
 Two recently graduated veterinary surgeons will be running the London Marathon in April to raise money for the charity World Animal Protection.

Alex Bartlett and Maeve O'Neill plan to run the race together if they are given the same start times.

Dr O'Neill said: "You're always limited in what you can do to help animals, so it is nice to raise money for a charity that helps animals around the world."

Dr Bartlett added: "I have never run a marathon before and am excited to run my first one for such a good cause!"

Both Dr Bartlett and Dr O'Neill have fundraising pages online. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
BSAVA releases new Guide to Procedures

The British Small Animal Veterinary Association (BSAVA) has published a new edition of its Guide to Procedures for Small Animal Practice.

It has added four new procedures; cystostomy tube placement, endotracheal intubation, point-of-care ultrasound and wet-to-dry dressings.

BSAVA says that it is an essential step-by-step guide to diagnostic and therapeutic procedures performed in practice. The textbook includes new images and illustrations, as well as high-definition videos for use prior to procedures.

Nick Bexfield and Julia Riggs, editors of the new edition, said: "We have built upon the success of the previous editions by responding to the feedback received from the BSAVA readership, and hope this new guide helps to further increase the confidence and accuracy with which these procedures are performed."

Print copies are available in the BSAVA store, with a digital version in the BSAVA library.