Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Vets join push for ‘total overhaul’ of Dangerous Dogs Act
Pit bull terriers are among the four breeds banned in the UK under the Dangerous Dogs Act.
BVA leads call for change on the legislation’s 30th anniversary.

Veterinary and animal welfare organisations have joined forces to prevent certain dog breeds from being put down based on their appearance.

The BVA has teamed up with Dogs Trust, Battersea, The Kennel Club and the RSPCA to push for changes to Section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act, which applies breed-specific legislation (BSL) banning the ownership of four different dog breeds.

BVA senior vice president Daniella Dos Santos said: “The veterinary profession has long campaigned for a total overhaul of the 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act because it targets specific breeds rather than deeds and gives a false impression that dogs not on the banned list are ‘safe’.

“All the latest evidence supports our view that breed-specific legislation has been ineffective in its intended aims, thereby failing to either properly protect the public or safeguard dog welfare over the last three decades.”

The move comes on the 30th Anniversary of the Dangerous Dogs Act, introduced to protect the public after a series of tragic incidents involving dogs. However, campaigners argue that the legislation was never well-considered or based on scientific evidence. 

In 2016, the RSPCA launched the #EndBSL campaign which led to a parliamentary inquiry into the legislation. Findings later published by the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee stated that a change in the law would be achievable and better protect the public, but the legislation remains unchanged. 

According to Battersea, the Dangerous Dogs Act has done little to protect the public from dog attacks, with hospital admissions for dog bites rising by 154 per cent between 1999 and 2019.

Battersea chief executive, Peter Laurie, said: “Every year many friendly dogs are unfairly condemned simply for the way that they look. Ultimately it is rescue organisations like Battersea who care for these dogs and that have to deal with this flawed and unfair legislation. We urge the Government to review the law properly; and work with welfare groups and dog owners to craft new legislation that puts the focus on a dog’s actions rather than its appearance.” 

Daniella Dos Santos added: "As the Dangerous Dogs Act completes 30 years, we continue to call on the Government to enact robust, fit-for-purpose legislation that effectively tackles individual acts of aggression and irresponsible ownership, rather than banning entire breeds.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.