Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Dogs may not reciprocate in food-giving interactions with humans, study finds
The study investigated whether dogs would reciprocate food-giving with humans.
When given the opportunity, the dogs in the study did not reciprocate the help provided. 

Dogs may not be prosocial and reciprocal in food-giving situations with humans, a study published in PLOS journal has found.

Published on 14 July 2021, the study, led by academics at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, investigated whether domestic dogs would reciprocate food-giving with humans. 

The dogs were exposed two different humans, one who was 'helpful', and activated a food dispenser to provide the dog with food, and one who was 'unhelpful' and did not provide the dog with food. The dogs then were provided with the opportunity to return food to both types of people.

There were two studies carried out, which differed in complexity and in time between the experience phase of the dog receiving the food, and the test phase to see whether the dog would return the favour. 

The researchers were interested in the subject, and called domestic dogs “a promising model species for the study of reciprocity” - citing previous studies held by other researchers which suggested that dogs engaged in prosocial behaviours other dogs in experimental settings. However, in both studies, it was found that the dogs did not reciprocate the receipt of food to either the helpful or unhelpful human.

Despite the domestic dogs in this study not behaving in a prosocial manner towards the humans, the authors of the study acknowledged in the introduction that it has been shown that the dogs may express prosocial behaviours in interspecific interactions in previous studies held by other researchers. 

Not only did the study show that the dogs did not reciprocate the food-giving, but in a time of interaction between the dog and the helpful and unhelpful human respectively, the dogs behaved similarly with both, suggesting no awareness of the helpful act, or potentially awareness, but no preference for either human type despite that.

In the conclusion of the study, the authors suggested several reasons for the dogs' lack of reciprocity, including possible methodological inadequacies, a lack of predisposition in dogs to engage in those cooperative actions with humans, and the lack of familiarity with the humans participating in the study. 

It was also noted that the usual instances of dog-human interaction involve the dog receiving food without requirement to reciprocate. However, as the study says, “It is, nonetheless, unclear why dogs would not extend their experimentally demonstrated reciprocal capacities to interactions with humans.” 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
BSAVA publishes fifth Manual of Canine and Feline Neurology

The BSAVA has published the fifth edition of its BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Neurology.

The new edition has been reviewed and updated, including new developments in diagnostics, therapeutic approaches and clinical decision-making. It is structured to support clinicians through diagnosis, treatment and long-term management.

The guide features five new chapters covering acute myelopathies, chronic myelopathies, emergency protocols, neurotoxicology and neuro-oncology.

It also includes over 100 videos, including demonstrations of neurological examinations, clinical presentations and diagnostic procedures.

Nicola Lloyd, publishing manager, said: "Whether you're a general practitioner seeking practical guidance, or a specialist aiming to refine your expertise, this edition remains an indispensable reference for anyone involved in the care of neurologically compromised dogs and cats."