Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

MPs to debate petition on breed specific legislation
The Government has responded negatively to the petition, defending its previous legislation.

The Government will respond to the 118,000 strong e-petition. 

On Monday 5 July, MPs will debate a petition asking for a replacement of breed specific legislation with a new statutory framework.

The debate will be opened by Elliot Colburn, Petitions Committee member, and Victoria Prentis, a Minister at DEFRA, will respond on the Government's behalf.

Gaining over 118,000 signatures, the original petition states:

"Breed Specific Legislation fails to achieve what Parliament intended, to protect the public. It focuses on specific breeds, which fails to appreciate a dog is not aggressive purely on the basis of its breed. It allows seizure of other breeds, but the rules are not applied homogeneously by councils.

“We need a system that focuses on the aggressive behaviour of dogs, and the failure of owners to control their dog, rather than the way a dog looks.”

The petition calls on the Government to reconsider a licensing system, stating: “The framework must be applied by local authorities the same, whereas currently some destroy dogs with no court order. It must be much more strictly controlled than it is currently. The system needs to be fairer for all, dogs and humans. We are touched by cases of people committing suicide over the current system.”

Responding negatively to the petition, the Government said: “The Government considers that prohibition on the four types of fighting dog under Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 should remain in place. This is supported by police who are responsible for enforcing the Act.”

British vets are joining the call for a 'deed not breed' approach, and the BVA and BSAVA recently updated their joint policy position on the 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act to reflect this.

Among the BVA and BSAVA's recommendations are; repealing section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act (1991), effectively enforcing and consolidating existing dog control legislation in the UK, establishing a centralised dog biting incident database, and promoting responsible ownership and safe dog-human interactions.

Lasting 90 minutes, the debate will take place in Westminster Hall from 6.15pm, and will be available to view on Parliament TV and YouTube 

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.