Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Pirbright reveals new insights into COVID-19
The origin of the COVID-19 outbreak remains unclear because no immediately related coronaviruses have been identified in animals.

Study indicates how the virus could have adapted from bats to humans. 

Researchers at The Pirbright Institute have revealed new insights into how the virus that causes COVID-19 could have adapted from bats to humans.

Their study, published in the journal PLOS Biology, identifies key differences in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that could be responsible for the jump from bats to humans, as well as other animals it could infect.

Dr Dalan Bailey, head of the Viral Glycoproteins Group at Pirbright, said: “Uncovering the common traits that allow viruses to jump between animals and humans helps us to identify potential reservoirs of disease and forewarn us of future threats.

“Using molecular techniques to study coronavirus spike proteins in isolation, without ever needing to work with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has enabled us to take an in-depth look at how genetic differences in coronavirus spike proteins and animal ACE2 receptors influence which animals the virus may be able to infect.”

Comparing genomes
The origin of the COVID-19 outbreak remains unclear because no immediately related coronaviruses have been identified in animals. The bat coronavirus, RaTG13, is the closet known relative, with a 96 per cent similarity to the SARS-CoV-2 genome.

In the study, researchers compared the genomes of both viruses, identifying several regions that differed between their spike proteins - those which the virus uses to bind to the ACE2 surface receptors of cells to gain entry.

Using a method that does not involve live virus, the scientists swapped these regions to examine how well the resulting spike proteins bound to human ACE2 receptors.

They found that SARS-CoV-2 spikes containing RaTG13 regions were unable to bind to human ACE2 receptors effectively. Conversely, the RaTG13 spikes containing SARS-CoV-2 regions could bind more efficiently to human receptors, although not to the same level as the unedited SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

This finding could indicate that similar changes in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein occurred historically, which may have played a key role in allowing the virus to jump the species barrier, the researchers said.

Future threats
The scientists also noted that these genetic adaptions were similar to those made by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) when it adapted from bats to infect humans, suggesting there may be a common mechanism by which this family of viruses mutates.

With this knowledge, researchers may in future be able to identify viruses circulating in animals that could adapt to infect humans and pose a pandemic threat.

Other animals
Finally, the team investigated whether the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein could bind to the ACE2 receptors of 22 different animals. They found that bat and bird receptors made the weakest interactions with SARS-CoV-2, giving weight to the evidence that SARS-CoV-2 likely adapted its spike protein when it jumped from bats into people.

Dogs, cats and cattle had the strongest interactors with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, suggesting that efficient entry into cells could mean that infection may establish easier in these animals.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.