Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Could robots replace real therapy dogs?
Olivia Barber (first author and PhD student) holding MiRo-E, while her own dog Tallulah looks on.

Study finds biomimetic robots may be a suitable replacement in certain situations.

New research published by the University of Portsmouth has highlighted the benefits of robotic therapy dogs for people with allergies.

The study, published in the Journal of Social Robotics, compared a MiRo-E biomimetic robot with real-life therapy dogs and found that it can be as effective and may even be a better alternative.

“We know that real dogs can provide calming and enjoyable interactions for children - increasing their feelings of wellbeing, improving motivation and reducing stress,” commented Dr Leanne Proops from the Department of Psychology.

“This preliminary study has found that biomimetic robots - robots that mimic animal behaviours - may be a suitable replacement in certain situations and there are some benefits to using them over a real dog.”

Dogs are often used in animal therapy, but there are concerns about using them in settings with children owing to the risk of triggering allergies or transmitting disease.

“Although lots of people in schools and hospitals benefit greatly from receiving visits from a therapy dog, we have to be mindful of the welfare of the therapy dog,” explains therapy dog owner and first author of the paper, Olivia Barber. “Visits can be stressful and incredibly tiring for therapy dogs, meaning that we should be exploring whether using a robotic animal is feasible.”

In the study, researchers assessed the interactions between a group of school children (aged 11-12), two Pets As Therapy dogs and a biomimetic robot. They found the children spent a similar amount of time stroking both the real-life dogs and the robot but spent more time interacting with the robot.

A survey of the children revealed that the children significantly preferred the session with the living dog. However, overall enjoyment was high, and the children expressed more positive emotions following interaction with the robot.

The more the children attributed mental states and sentience to the dog and robot, the more they enjoyed the sessions, the researchers said.

Dr Proops said: “This is a small-scale study, but the results show that interactive robotic animals could be used as a good comparison to live dogs in research, and a useful alternative to traditional animal therapy.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.