Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Vets welcome 'under care' guidance review
"Continually extending the temporary measures without a full analysis would risk undermining our position" - BVA president, James Russell.
BVA calls on the RCVS to end temporary measures for remote prescribing.

British Veterinary Association (BVA) president James Russell has welcomed a decision by RCVS Council to resume the 'under care' guidance review.

Mr Russell has also welcomed a decision by RCVS Council to review the temporary guidance that allows vets to prescribe POM-V products remotely without physically examining the animal, and has called on the College to bring this temporary measure to an end.

“We understand that allowing remote prescription of POM-Vs was a necessary measure at the height of the lockdown, as practices struggled to assess patients in person,” he said. “However, the veterinary professions have done a fantastic job in adapting to the restrictions and are now able to work safely and see patients.”

In September, BVA wrote to the RCVS raising concern over the August extension to the temporary guidance. In its latest update, the RCVS extended the temporary measure to 31 October but updated the guidance and flowchart to include additional steps before a POM-V can be remotely prescribed.

“Whilst we recognise the RCVS has provided additional guidance for the remote prescribing of POM-V, we cannot currently see any reason why a new client would be unable to access in-person veterinary care in the first instance and we are asking RCVS Council to reconsider this measure when it meets in Oct,” Mr Russell continued.

“It makes sense to continue allowing vets to remotely prescribe for existing patients, for example, if an owner is shielding, but we feel it is no longer appropriate to be remotely prescribing to animals that have never been physically examined by the vet.”

He added that questions about whether vets should be able to prescribe POM-Vs remotely is an 'important and live debate'. But he stressed that the longer the temporary measures are in place, 'the greater the expectation from animal owners that they will always be in place'.

“As a profession, we are rightly concerned about antimicrobial resistance and we pride ours ourselves on the responsible use of medicines,” he said. “Continually extending the temporary measures without a full analysis would risk undermining our position.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.