Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Why some dog owners use punishment to deal with aggression
The study highlighted the potential for extreme negative emotional responses and feelings of failure in the dog owner when their dog shows aggression.
Study explores motivation for using positive and negative methods 

Bristol scientists have explored the factors affecting whether dog owners use positive or negative training methods to deal with aggression in their pets.

Current evidence suggests that positive reinforcement techniques are a humane and effective way to treat aggressive behaviour, whereas punishment-based methods are likely to impact welfare and potentially increase aggression levels. Yet many owners continue to use these outdated techniques.

Researchers from the University of Bristol wanted to find out why some owners still use punishment methods, and what the barriers and drivers are for using positive reinforcement.

Their findings, published in the journal Risk Analysis, suggest that key factors are the owner’s perception of how effective the behaviour modification will be, as well as their own ability to apply them.

The research team concluded that clinical behaviourists should focus on helping dog owners to feel confident about the effectiveness of the techniques they recommend and in their ability to use them successfully.

In addition, the study highlighted the emotional impact of managing a reactive dog and the potential for extreme negative emotional responses and feelings of failure in the dog owner when their dog shows aggression. Dr Emily Blackwell, from Bristol Veterinary School, said it is important for practitioners to consider the wellbeing of the owner as well as the dog.

She added: “Our findings highlight the need for behaviourists to offer practical support to owners, to demonstrate the effectiveness of reward-based training and to provide them with an opportunity to practice under expert guidance, so that they feel confident in their ability to use the techniques before attempting to apply them independently.”

Dr Emily Williams, from Bristol’s School of Psychological Science, said: “The majority of research on companion animal behaviour has focused on the behaviour of the animal itself, rather than the behaviour of the owner. We believe this is the first time that psychological theories exploring how people respond to threatening situations, such as Protection Motivation Theory, have been applied to understand people’s interactions with their pets.”

The study provides a foundation for future research exploring the influence of different psychological factors on an owner’s decision to use positive reinforcement techniques to manage aggressive behaviours.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.