Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Inspectors to introduce tougher inspection regime for tail docking
Routine tail docking is not permitted by law.
Producers must prove that docking has been used as a last resort

A tougher inspection regime for tail docking and enrichment in pigs is set to be introduced after several producers were found to have fallen foul of APHA’s enhanced enforcement activity.

According to the National Pig Association (NPA), Defra and the APHA will be clamping down on tail docking ‘in a big way’. The move is reported to have originated from the European Commission, which is putting pressure on all member states to enforce tail docking and enrichment legislation.

In an article for Pig World, NPA said that each member state was required to submit an action plan at the start of 2018. In the UK plan, Defra and the APHA made several commitments, including the increased inspection of pig farms.

The plan also included new guidance and training of APHA assessors and better recording of tail biting and docking in abattoirs by the Food Standards Agency.

Commenting on the inspections, a Defra spokesperson said: “Routine tail docking is not permitted by law. Pig farmers need to demonstrate at inspections that tail docking has been used as a last resort after taking the necessary steps, as described in the current welfare code, to reduce the risks of tail biting.

“This includes actions to improve the pigs’ environment and their management. We want full compliance.”

Producers that have already fallen foul of APHA’s enhanced enforcement activity have received deductions to their Basic Payment and/or served enforcement notices. NPA chief executive Zoe Davis said the penalties were being imposed where tails were being routinely docked and farmers had not taken steps to prevent tail biting - such as improving the pigs’ environment.

“We are keen to ensure that producers are not unfairly penalised. We are seeking more clarity in a number of areas and are feeding into the discussion on the new Welfare Code to ensure it provides this,” she said.

“We are also trying to get across the complexity of dealing with tailing biting outbreaks. It is a multifactorial problem and can be unpredictable. Pig producers in all systems experience tail biting to varying degrees and once an outbreak has started it can be very difficult to stop.

“Experience has shown that in some situations, there will be a need to dock tails to prevent a worse situation. At the same time, we are trying to avoid situations where farmers feel compelled to stop tail docking without veterinary supervision or taking steps to avoid tail biting – and end up creating worse problems.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.