Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Vets call on George Eustice to retract badger cull statement
Examination of the data found no reduction in the prevalence of bTB infected herds in Gloucestershire or Somerset.
Open letter claims cull has not resulted in bTB decrease

Senior vets and animal protection organisations have signed an open letter expressing concern over claims that badger culling has lowered bovine TB (bTB) cases in cull zones.

The 16 vets and animal welfare experts from institutions across the UK call on George Eustice MP to retract his statement, in which he says the government’s strategy for coping with the disease ‘is delivering results’.

Mr Eustice was referring to data which suggests bTB levels in Gloucestershire and Somerset are now around half what they were before the badger culls began. But according to the letter’s signatories, ’there are approximately the same proportion of bTB affected herds now, as there were before culling started’.

The letter states that examination of the data in detail found no reduction in the prevalence of bTB infected herds in Gloucestershire or Somerset as a result of culling. Its authors note that methods used by Defra to reach their conclusion ‘merit analysis’ and that greater clarity ‘can be obtained ‘by focusing on prevalence rather than incidence.’

‘We respectfully request that Mr Eustice withdraw his inaccurate statement and that, having consulted with Mr Gove and Defra’s chief vet, he issue a corrected statement on a newly entitled document which accurately reflects bTB prevalence in cattle after four years if badger culling in Gloucestershire and Somerset,’ the letter reads.

The signatories also refer to published footage that shows how a badger took a minute to die after being shot by a cull contractor, noting increasing public unease at the animal suffering associated with the badger cull.

‘The badger cull has produced no measurable reduction in the percentage of bTB infected herds in cull zones but has produced a well-documented increase in badger harm. Neither the veterinary profession nor the general public will tolerate such abuse in plain sight,’ they write.

The letter was addressed to the editor of The Observer and published in full by Network for Animals. Organised by Dr Iain McGill, director of the Prion Interest Group, other signatories include Andrew Knight, professor of animal welfare and ethics at the University of Winchester and Richard Saunders, an RCVS specialist in zoo and wildlife medicine.

It was also signed by Dr Mark Jones, head of policy at Born Free, Dominic Dyer, CEO of the Badger Trust, and Adam Grogan, head of wildlife at the RSPCA. 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.