Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Dogs not as intelligent as first thought - study
The researchers focussed on physical cognition, sensory cognition, social cognition, spatial cognition and self-awareness.

Scientists review evidence on the cognitive abilities of dogs 

Dogs are not exceptionally intelligent when compared with other animals, according to new research.

The study, published in Learning and Behaviour, reviewed more than 300 pieces of evidence that compared the cognitive abilities of domestic dogs with three distinct animal groups (other domestic animals, social hunters and carnivores).

Researchers found that the brain power of dogs was matched by at least several species in each group, and that there were several cases of “over-interpretation” in favour of dogs’ abilities.

The study was carried out by the Universities of Exeter and Canterbury Christ Church.

“During our work it seemed to us that many studies in dog cognition research set out to ‘prove’ how clever dogs are,” explained Professor Stephen Lea from the University of Exeter.

“They are often compared to chimpanzees and whenever dogs ‘win’, this gets added to their reputation as something exceptional. Yet in each and every case we found other valid comparison species that do at least as well as dogs do in those tasks.”

The researchers focussed on physical cognition, sensory cognition, social cognition, spatial cognition and self-awareness.

"Taking all three groups into account, dog cognition does not look exceptional,” said Dr Britta Osthaus from Canterbury Christ Church University.

“We are doing dogs no favour by expecting too much of them. Dogs are dogs, and we need to take their needs and true abilities into account when considering how we treat them.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.