Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Computer algorithms ‘could replace animal testing’
Animal testing is unpopular with the public for moral reasons, and among manufacturers due to the high costs and uncertainties about results.
Study finds new method gives more accurate results 

Computer algorithms could replace toxicology testing on animals, scientists say, after new research found such methods are better at predicting toxicity.

Scientists from John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health mined a large database of known chemicals, to map the relationships between chemical structures and toxic properties.

Findings published in the journal Toxicological Sciences shows the map can be used to automatically predict the toxic properties of a chemical compound more accurately than a single animal test.

Principal investigator Thomas Hartung said: “These results are a real eye opener - they suggest that we can replace many animal tests with computer-based prediction and get more reliable results.”

The most advanced tool they developed was, on average, 87 per cent accurate in reproducing the consensus results of animal tests. This was done across nine tests which represent 57 per cent of the world’s animal toxicology testing. By comparison, the repetition of the same animal tests in the database was only 81 per cent accurate on average.

Each year millions of animals such as mice, rabbits, guinea pigs and dogs are used for chemical toxicity tests in laboratories around the world. Whilst this is often required by law to protect consumers, the practice is unpopular with the public for moral reasons, and among manufacturers due to the high costs and uncertainties about results.

According to Hartung, a new pesticide may require 30 separate animal tests, costing the sponsoring company around $20 million. The study found that the same chemical in the database had often been tested dozens of times in the same way.

“Our automated approach clearly outperformed the animal test, in a very solid assessment using data on thousands of different chemicals and tests,” he added. “So it’s big news for toxicology.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Applications open for MMI research grants

News Story 1
 RCVS' Mind Matters Initiative (MMI) has launched round two of its veterinary mental health research grants.

Researchers have until 11.59pm on Wednesday, 28 May 2025 to apply for a grant for research which reflects MMI's 2025 focus areas.

Only one Impact Grant was awarded last year, and so this year there are two Discovery Grants and one Impact Grants available. Each Discovery Grant is worth £5,000 and the Impact Grant is worth £15,000.

For more information or to apply, email researchgrants@rcvs.org.uk to contact the MMI team.

 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
BBC Radio 4 documentary addresses corporate fees

BBC Radio 4's File on 4 Investigates has released a documentary exploring how corporate-owned veterinary practices may be inflating bills to increase profit.

Released on 15 April, 'What's Happening To Your Vet Bills?' revealed the policies which many corporate groups have in place to increase their profits. This included targets and upgrades which veterinary teams are tasked with meeting on a regular basis.

It also features Anrich Vets, an independently-owned practice based in Wigan. Following the case of Staffordshire terrier Benjy, who is diagnosed with a tumour, the documentary shares how the team were able to offer contextualised care and advice to make the procedure as affordable as possible for his owners.

The documentary can be heard on demand on BBC iPlayer.