Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Defra clarifies position on pig tail docking
"Pig farmers need to demonstrate at inspections that tail docking has been used as a last resort..."
Producers increasingly penalised for the practice - NPA 

Defra’s position on tail docking has been clarified, after an increasing number of pig producers are being penalised for the practice.

Routine tail docking is not permitted under EU law and may only be carried out when there is evidence of tail biting and all other measures to prevent this have been attempted.

At a recent National Pig Association (NPA) meeting, attendees heard about the case of a producer in the south west, who was handed a five per cent reduction to his BPS payment for tail docking. NPA said it understands court proceedings have been threatened in some cases.

Duncan Berkshire, president of the Pig Veterinary Society (PVS), explained: “This is about routine tail docking without all measures possible to prevent tail-biting being evident in the pens, including the provision of manipulable materials.”

Asked to clarify its position, a Defra spokesperson said: “Routine tail docking is not permitted by law. Pig farmers need to demonstrate at inspections that tail docking has been used as a last resort after taking the necessary steps, as described in the current welfare codes, to reduce the risks of tail biting. This includes actions to improve the pigs’ environment and their management.”

One of the concerns, according to Mr Berkshire, is that inspectors appear to have different interpretations of how producers are addressing the issue, with some regional variation reported.

The NPA said it is working actively to address the situation, collaborating with other parties to bring greater clarity to producers.

NPA chief executive Zoe Davies said: “We advise producers to do all they can to assess what would need to be done before they could stop tail docking, and to record any evidence. But we need to work more closely with Government to manage the transition more carefully and sensibly.

“Our concern is that producers will be panicked into not tail docking when previously there was no tail biting problem and create a much worse situation.”

NPA has set up a tail docking working group comprised of government, industry and academia to develop a joint approach to reduce tail docking.

Defra also consulted on a new statutory pig welfare code, which would provide more detailed information on the different factors causing tail biting, and advice on how to prevent it without docking tails. It is currently analysing the responses.

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.