Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

New study sheds light on rabbit handling
If future research identifies more appropriate handling methods, researchers said this information must be consistent and available across a wide range of media.
Further research needed to determine rabbits’ experiences 

A new survey suggests the most popular method of rabbit handling is supporting the animal’s body against the chest, while ‘scruffing’ with rear support is the least popular.

Researchers carried out an online survey of pet owners, breeders, veterinary staff and laboratory personnel, who were shown photographs of five different handling methods.

Out of 2,644 respondents, 86.2 per cent said they had used method B (supporting rabbits against the chest); compared to method E (scruffing), which was used by 15.3 per cent.

Other methods studied were:
  • Method A - Rabbit supported with both arms (63.6 per cent)
  • Method C - One hand under the chest, the other hand under the bottom, held slightly away from the handler’s chest (53.6 per cent)
  • Method D - Rabbit on its back, which can induce tonic immobility (59.9 per cent). However, 71 per cent of participants felt this would be a negative experience for the rabbit. It was mainly used for health checks, grooming or administering medication.

Methods A and E were more commonly used by those with laboratory experience, but E was the least frequently used in all other contexts. Method B was more popular with pet owners and in all other work contexts.

Meanwhile, Methods D and E appeared to prompt a negative emotional response, with 11 participants calling method D ‘wrong’, ‘cruel’, ‘dangerous’ or ‘dreadful’. Likewise, 80 people said method E was ‘cruel’, ‘distressing’, ‘disgraceful’, ‘horrible’, ‘painful’, or ‘uncaring’. Participants were also seven times more likely to say “I was told never to do that”, in response to photos D and E.

Methods A and C were viewed as being the most unfamiliar or difficult to use, but there were fewer welfare concerns about A and B, compared to C, D and E.

The research team, writing in the Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, encouraged further research to explore rabbits’ experiences during handling, to identify methods that are easy to use, with the fewest welfare compromises.

However, if future research identifies more appropriate handling methods, researchers said this information must be disseminated in a way that will reach handlers. It must also be consistent and available across a wide range of media in order to have a significant impact on handling and, therefore, rabbit welfare.

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.