Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Why do we make mistakes?
There is the potential for staff to thrive or survive after a mistake is made.
Catherine Oxtoby discusses human error and blame culture

In human medicine, it is widely accepted that doctors are nurses are the ‘second victims’ when they make a mistake that harms a patient, and the same is true of veterinary professionals.

Speaking at SPVS/VMG Congress, Catherine Oxtoby said medics involved in patient safety investigations report very similar symptoms to vets and nurses. Signs include extreme sadness, difficulty concentrating, depression, repetitive or intrusive memories, sleep disturbance and avoidance of similar types of patient care.

When a mistake is made, the impact on the professional involved can be devastating and long-lasting. Among vets and nurses, evidence suggests there is a fear of being blamed by the RCVS, clients, colleagues and senior staff. In addition, we blame ourselves for falling short of our own exceptionally high standards.

So is there a culture of blame in the veterinary profession? As humans, Catherine said, it is our knee-jerk reaction to blame those who make mistakes, or to believe we could have performed better. Outcome bias also means we are pre-programmed to be critical when we know the outcome is bad.

However, to some extent, mistakes are inevitable due to our cognitive limitations. When we are hungry, angry, late or tired (HALT), we are going to make mistakes. Rather than ‘soldiering on’, we need to put systems in place to mitigate human limitations. Assigning blame or saying “try to be more careful next time” is counter-productive and will not prevent errors.

The aviation industry has made significant progress in improving safety. A study in 2006 (Sexton) found that only 26 per cent of pilots felt they could perform as well when tired, compared to 70 per cent of vets. Just over half (53 per cent) per cent said they were able to leave problems at home while working, compared to 83 per cent of vets; and only seven per cent said juniors should not question the decisions of senior staff, compared to 45 per cent of vets.

Coffee giant Starbucks uses closed loop communication to prevent errors - asking customers to confirm their order and writing their name on the cup. Catherine said the profession could learn from this, as research shows 40 per cent of all errors in theatre are down to a breakdown in communication between team members.

There is the potential for staff to thrive or survive after a mistake is made. If they receive the proper support, they can learn from their mistakes and become better clinicians; if not, it could lead to long-term suffering and loss of confidence.

Barriers to seeking help among doctors are lack of time, lack of confidence, not knowing who to go to, fear of being seen as ‘weak’ or believing their problems are ‘not important’. Catherine said practices must design systems to make it easy to find help, including an approachable figure to talk to. It is essential to be aware of biases and human factors, and to assess the situation objectively to find out what went wrong.

In the words of one clinician who spoke to Catherine about a patient safety issue she was involved with; believe in yourself, do the best you can, don’t carry the weight of the world on your shoulders, learn and move on.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.