Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Michael Gove ‘actively reviewing’ animal cruelty penalties
Environment secretary Michael Gove has said he is ‘actively reviewing’ current penalties for animal cruelty.
Move welcomed by animal welfare groups

Environment secretary Michael Gove has said he is ‘actively reviewing’ current penalties for animal cruelty and could be toughening up punishments for the worst offenders.

According to the website Politics Home, Mr Gove made the pledge during departmental questions yesterday morning (20 July).

Responding to a question from conservative MP Philip Davies, he said: "It’s something I’m actively reviewing.

“As the Honourable Gentleman knows, I’m not someone who will automatically reach for stronger criminal sanctions as the only route to dealing with a problem, but there are particular cases of animal cruelty where we may well need to revisit the existing criminal sanctions to ensure the very worst behaviour is dealt with within the full force of the law.”

The move has been welcomed by animal welfare campaigners, who have long fought for tougher sentencing for animal abusers.

Chris Pitt, deputy director of Campaigns for the League Against Cruel Sports said: "We are pleased to hear Michael Gove recognises that current maximum sentences for animal cruelty offences are inadequate and need reviewing. Dog fighting, one of the most brutal and heinous forms of animal abuse, shockingly only carries a maximum six-month prison sentence,  and yet if found guilty of fly tipping, individuals can face up to five years in prison.
 
“Current sentences have remained unchanged for over a hundred years and therefore fail to reflect the horrific cruelty inflicted on animals in the name of barbaric ‘sports’ such as dog fighting.”

The RSPCA also welcomed the announcement, adding that there is a huge strength of feeling behind a move to toughen up theses sentences.

“Our most recent figures show that there are over 30 animal cases where the maximum prison sentence was given under the present law and in some cases, the magistrates expressed frustration that they could not give a higher sentence. Many of these are for the most serious crimes including animal fighting and deliberate cruelty,” the RSPCA said in a statement.

“We were disappointed the previous Government chose to ignore the Select Committee recommendation to increase the maximum sentence for animal cruelty offences to five years imprisonment. This move would have brought our sentences in line with Northern Ireland.

“As suggested by Mr Gove in the House of Commons this morning, we hope that the Government will revisit this issue and look at bringing in longer jail sentences for the most serious cases of animal abuse and neglect."

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
New guidance for antibiotic use in rabbits

New best practice guidance on the responsible use of antibiotics in rabbits has been published by the BSAVA in collaboration with the Rabbit Welfare Association & Fund (RWA&F).

The guidance is free and has been produced to help veterinary practitioners select the most appropriate antibiotic for rabbits. It covers active substance, dose and route of administration all of which are crucial factors when treating rabbits owing to the risk of enterotoxaemia.

For more information and to access the guide, visit the BSAVALibrary.