Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

What drives people to abuse animals?
"By our very nature we are a very caring profession and it is quite a challenge for us to get our heads around why one, somebody would want to deliberately hurt an animal" - Paula Boyden.
Paula Boyden speaks at BSAVA Congress

Opening the welfare and ethics stream at BSAVA Congress this morning, Paula Boyden - Dogs Trust veterinary director and treasurer of The Links Group - spoke about what drives people to abuse animals and offered pointers for recognising signs of animal cruelty in patients.

She explained that there are a whole range of terms that may be used to describe abuse, but the fundamental rule to remember is that we need to be really clear about the terminology and what we mean when we use those terms.

She explained that in the case of companion animals, the well-researched terminology associated with child abuse can be used to avoid any confusion within professions.

Paula noted that the recognised categories of abuse are physical, sexual, emotional and neglect. These terms are also known as non-accidental injuries (NAI) or 'battered child syndrome' and can be difficult - both emotionally and intellectually - to deal with.

Commenting on the typical veterinary personality, she said: "By our very nature we are a very caring profession and it is quite a challenge for us to get our heads around why one, somebody would want to deliberately hurt an animal and two, why would they then bring it to us to get it fixed. It just does not sit right at all."

Paula spoke of the similarities in the abuse of humans and the abuse of animals and explained that this is due to one common denominator: the human perpetrator. She said that perpetrators of abuse will use the strength of the human/animal bond to have power and control over their victims. For example: 'if you don't do as I say, I will hurt the family pet.'

Paula concluded her lecture by looking at what vets are allowed and what vets are not allowed to do when it comes to reporting abuse. She referred to the recently published guidelines for vets and nurses on recognising the symptoms of domestic abuse, which were launched by the Animal Welfare Foundation and The Links Group last year.

The guidance document provides a reminder of the veterinary profession's responsibilities under the Animal Welfare Act and defines the types of abuse and how to recognise them.

It also gives an overview of the links between child, animal and domestic abuse, explains the importance of a multi-agency approach, and offers practical advice on how to establish channels of communication with human agencies.

For more information about the Links Group visit www.thelinksgroup.org.uk.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.