Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Rules on electronic training aids ‘must be robust’
Dogs Trust said it does not condone the use of equipment or techniques that use pain or fear to train dogs.

Dogs Trust meets MSPs to discuss concerns over regulations

Proposals to regulate the use of electronic training aids in Scotland may not be robust enough to protect dog welfare, the Dogs Trust has said.

The Scottish government intends to regulate the use of remote control training collars, anti-bark collars and pet containment fences, so that they can only be used under the guidance of an approved trainer or veterinary surgeon. The decision was made following a consultation in 2015.

Representatives from the Dogs Trust recently met MSPs, urging them to back their appeal for approved trainers and vets to have adequate training in animal behaviour.

The charity said it does not condone the use of equipment or techniques that use pain or fear to train dogs, and has previously called for the devices to be banned.

Head of public affairs Claire Calder said: “In the absence of an outright ban we strongly urge strict regulations be imposed to minimise the risk of misuse of such equipment. Recent research by Defra has concluded that the routine use of electronic training collars, even in accordance with ‘best-practice’ presents a risk to the well-being of pet dogs.

“We are calling on MSPs to back our appeal for approved trainers and vets to have appropriate training in animal behaviour, as set out in the Animal Behaviour Training Council’s Standard for an Animal Trainer, as we have strong concerns that the suggested Regulations will not be robust enough to protect dog welfare.

"There is currently no regulation of animal trainers in Scotland, and veterinary training includes relatively little detailed information about animal behaviour.”

MSP David Stewart said he “fully support[s]” the charity’s call for action on electronic training collars and pledged to work with them to ensure dog welfare is protected.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.