Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Redwings report provides new insights on strangles
horses
More than a third of respondents (36 per cent) believed strangles to be ‘an airborne disease like flu’.
Owners willing to improve biosecurity, but myths persist

Myths and negative attitudes about strangles could be preventing horse owners from taking action to prevent the disease, a new survey suggests.

Redwings Horse Sanctuary carried out the 2016 survey in collaboration with the University of Liverpool, after a strangles outbreak in one of its own herds in 2015.

Survey responses from nearly 5,000 people revealed an interest and a willingness among horse owners to improve biosecurity and invest in screening.

However, the survey also revealed more than a third of respondents (36 per cent) believed it to be ‘an airborne disease like flu’, whereas in fact it is spread through direct contact with an infected animal or infected material. Redwings believes this misconception may be giving weight to the idea that owners are unable to prevent the disease.

A large proportion of respondents felt it was ‘not possible’ to eradicate strangles in the UK (49.3 per cent partly or completely agreed). Worryingly, 16.6 per cent of respondents said one of the ‘main reasons’ they did not take further steps to prevent strangles was because they believed it is ‘not possible to prevent strangles/it is just something that happens’.

Horse owners who had not experienced strangles tended to be more pessimistic - the attitude being largely that it is a ‘life-threatening disease’ and something that is ‘difficult to treat’. Those with experience of strangles tended to be more pragmatic about prevention and management.

Survey pioneer Andie Vilela explained: “It is not only strangles that we need to stamp out, but the attitudes and perceptions towards the disease that prevent or undermine motivation for horse owners to act.”

While the majority of respondents (90 per cent) thought strangles should be more of a priority in the UK, only 13 per cent of those who kept their horses at a livery yard had them screened for strangles on arrival, and nearly three quarters did not have a screening protocol for new arrivals.

This lack of screening does not appear to be down to a lack of willingness to follow protocol, according to Redwings, as 79.6 per cent said they were ‘very likely’ or ‘likely’ to use a yard that had strangles testing for new arrivals. And nearly 80 per cent of respondents said they would be prepared to prove their horse was not a ‘silent carrier’ by paying for screening.

Awareness and understanding of the symptoms were also good, with the majority correctly identifying fever (92.5 per cent) and, albeit later, the classic nasal discharge (96 per cent), as clinical signs of strangles. Forty-three per cent had personal experience of strangles, of which nearly half said the case was confirmed by a vet.

The survey launched last year as part of the charity’s Stamp Out Strangles campaign. Andie Vilela said she has “real confidence” in the next stage of the campaign, which involves increasing owner awareness, improving biosecurity measures and eradicating the disease among the horse population.

“I believe the key to achieve this is more screening on yards and for carriers to be cleared of the disease,” she added.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.