Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Mixed views on government’s animal welfare response
dog
Currently, the maximum prison sentence for animal cruelty offences in England and Wales is up to six months.
Maximum jail sentences for cruelty will not be extended

Animal welfare charities say they are disappointed by the government’s decision not to extend the maximum jail sentence for animal cruelty offences.

A report by the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Committee recently called for the penalty to be increased to five years in prison. Currently, the maximum sentence in England and Wales is up to six months in prison, a ban on keeping animals and/or an unlimited fine, which is the lowest sentence in Europe.

Responding to EFRA’s report today (7 February), the government declined to increase the maximum sentence, but said the Sentencing Council has revised the magistrates’ court sentencing guidelines, with the aim of ensuring that the most serious cases of animal cruelty receive the most appropriate severe sentences, within the maximum sentencing guidelines.

The government’s response stated: ‘Current sentencing practice for offences of animal cruelty in the Animal Welfare Act 2006 does not suggest that the courts are finding current sentencing powers inadequate’.

In 2015, the government says the average sentence was 3.3 months, while the average fine amount was £244.

Battersea Dogs and Cats Home’s chief executive Claire Horton said in a statement: “The current sentence for such offences is inadequate, both as a punishment and a deterrent for those who mistreat and neglect animals to the point of unacceptable suffering.”

The government also said the 2006 Act should not restrict the ability to bring private prosecutions, meaning the RSPCA will be able to continue this role. The charity will not be made a specialist reporting authority, but should be allowed to implement recommendations from the Wooler Review, which the charity set up in light of public criticism of its role.

Responding to other EFRA recommendations, the government said it will look into the possibility of protecting the progeny of dogs, but remarked that the Kennel Club Assured Breeder Scheme includes requirements for the genetic screening of breeding dogs for inherited conditions.

As the UK prepares to exit from the EU, the government will also be reviewing the current system for equine identification and inviting views from the equine sector.

Last week a suite of reforms to animal establishment licensing was announced. Expected to come into force in 2018, the new rules include a ban on selling puppies under the age of eight weeks, alongside a requirement for anyone breeding and selling three or more litters of puppies a year to be licensed. In addition, anyone trading commercially in pets online will need to be properly licensed.

However, the government decided against a ban on third party sales of dogs, citing concerns about enforcement, and the possibility that a ban could drive sales further underground. Similarly, calls to make PAAG’s minimum standards compulsory for all websites selling pets were declined, with the government noting concerns about enforcement.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.