Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Cites meeting described as 'game changer'
elephants
Delegates at the meeting rejected Swaziland's proposal to sell just over 300kg of stockpiled rhino horn.
Mixed views on actions agreed to protect wildlife

The triennial Cites meeting in Johannesburg has been hailed as a 'game changer' for vulnerable wildlife, with 152 governments coming together to make decisions on 62 proposals.

During two weeks of negotiations world governments have adopted a suite of actions to combat illicit wildlife trafficking, higher protection for groups of species and agreements on closer engagement with rural communities.

Among species to gain extra protection were the African grey parrot, elephant and pangolin.

Delegates at the meeting rejected Swaziland's proposal to sell just over 300kg of stockpiled rhino horn, followed by around 20kg each year derived from its small population of white rhinos. The request was rejected by 100 votes to 26, with 17 countries abstaining from the vote.

The Born Free Foundation welcomed the decision saying it would have legitimised rhino horn in the eyes of consumers, and undermined efforts to protect the species.

Delegates also soundly rejected attempts by Zimbabwe and Namibia to sell their ivory stockpiles to international buyers. Currently elephant populations in the two countries are protected under the Cites Appendix II listing, which prevents the sale of their ivory. The proposals wold have removed these restrictions but failed to win the support of a two-thirds majority.

However, the European Union (EU) blocked proposals to acquire a Cites Appendix I listing for elephants in South Africa, Namibia, Botswana and Zimbabwe, as is the case for the rest of Africa's elephants. The proposal was put forward by the African Elephant Coalition, whose 29 members make up the majority of elephant range states, but failed because the EU voted against.

Born Free called the EU's decision "a disgrace" and "totally out of touch with the wishes of EU citizens".

Despite the vote, Botswana's environment minister, the Honourable Tsekedi Kharma, said his country would voluntarily treat its elephant populations as though they were Appendix I, removing the possibility of ivory trade from Botswana.

There was also a proposal to ban international trade of lion products by listing Africa's lions on Appendix I, but negotiations resulted in a compromise whereby lions remain on Appendix II but with a moratorium on commercial trade in bones and other products from wild lions. Captive breeders evaded the ban, however.

All in all 51 proposals were accepted, five rejected and six withdrawn.

Cites secretary-general John E Scanlon said the meeting was "a game changer that will be remembered as a point in history when the tide turned in favour of ensuring the survival of our most vulnerable wildlife."

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.