Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Divided poaching debate continues in Johannesburg
elephants
Currently, elephants are protected by Appendix II, which still allows trade in species and parts.
Conference of the Parties (COP) addressing elephant welfare
 
The Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) commenced on Saturday 24 September with the elephant poaching and ivory trade legislation debate expected to dominate the 2,500 delegates from 180 countries.

Plummeting numbers and concerning rises in illegal ivory activities despite current restrictions have generated a variety of proposals with polarised approaches to the current elephant problem.

Currently, elephants are protected by Appendix II, which still allows trade in species and parts. Many African countries attending the meeting are seeking raising restrictions to Appendix I for all African elephants, to entirely criminalise ivory trade. However, Zimbabwe and Namibia are proposing liberalisation of the restrictions.  

Conservation groups who are backing the tougher stance on poachers have been troubled by the CITES secretariat who are hesitant to impose the up-listing to Appendix I, due to concerns it will drive certain nations to opt out of CITES altogether.

Iris Ho from Humane Society International said: “There is no greater protection for imperilled species from detrimental trade than an Appendix I listing. A continued split-listing of the African elephant is akin to a declaration by CITES to open the ivory trade for business.”

A surge in poaching has seen elephant numbers fall by 30 per cent in seven years. Despite initial numbers suggesting a slowing of the trend, 2015 data has suggested that high levels of ivory and high levels of poaching are as big a threat as ever.  

The seventeenth COP in the 43-year history of CITES is running until 5 October.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.