Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Trophy hunting 'could help to conserve lions' - study
lion
"Increasing block fees, reducing trophy fees and reducing the hunting quota could bring in the same tax revenue, while reducing the temptation of hunters to kill more lions."
Overhaul of system needed to prioritise sustainability, not profits

Scientists from the UK and Australia say that controlled trophy hunting of lions could help to conserve the species, but an overhaul of the current system is needed.

Lions need large protected areas but managing this land is expensive; researchers say the operating budgets for protected areas in developing countries cover an average of just 30 per cent of the costs.

A year after an American dentist and recreational hunter killed Cecil the lion outside Hwange National Park in Zimbabwe, researchers from the Universities of Cambridge, Kent and Queensland studied lion population trends in Tanzania's Selous Game Reserve between 1996 and 2008.

Tanzania is Africa's main location for lion trophy hunting, and is also home to up to half the world's free-ranging lions. The game reserve is split into blocks in which hunting rights are allocated to different companies. The government leases land to the hunting companies, enforces hunting regulations and allocates a species-specific annual quota per block.

Under the current system blocks are sold off cheaply and further cash raised by setting high quotas and high fees for each trophy animal shot, explains senior author Professor Nigel Leader-Williams. This encourages companies that are allocated blocks for short periods (less than 10 years) to shoot more lions, researchers write in the journal PLOS ONE.

The team found that companies allocated a block for less than 10 years killed more lions, and more trophy species generally. Annual financial returns for these blocks were also higher. But for those allocated land for more than 10 years, the number of licensed lion kills were at a sustainable level for the species and also maintained their habitat.

Prof Leader-Williams, who is from Cambridge's department of geography, said: "Increasing block fees, reducing trophy fees and reducing the hunting quota could bring in the same tax revenue, while reducing the temptation of hunters to kill more lions."

First author Dr Henry Brink, from the University of Kent, called the findings "an important lesson" for lion conservation, as the species is increasingly restricted to protected areas due to loss of habitat.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.