Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

'Majority' of vets asked to euthanise healthy pets
aggressive dog
Euthanasia of healthy animals is the "hidden, tragic cost" of poor early socialisation, BVA president Sean Wensley said.
Behavioural problems are a key issue, BVA poll finds

Nearly all vets have been asked to put a healthy pet to sleep, most commonly due to the animal's behavioural problems, according to a BVA poll.

Only two per cent of vets questioned as part of the BVA's Voice of the Veterinary Profession survey had never been asked to euthanise a healthy animal. Of those who had been asked, 98 per cent said the owners gave 'behavioural issues' as the reason.

Problem behaviours seen by vets may include persistent barking and howling, destructive chewing, inappropriate toileting and aggressive behaviour to people or other animals.

Other reasons given by owners for requesting euthanasia included ill health of the owner, new accommodation that doesn't allow pets, legal/enforcement action, divorce/change of circumstances, change in finances, moving overseas and a new child in the family.

BVA president Sean Wensley called the figures "stark" and "likely to come as a shock to members of the public". He also commented on the burden this places on vets.

"Nobody enters the veterinary profession wanting to euthanise healthy pets, but this is the stressful situation that many vets are facing because of undesirable behaviours in pet animals.

"Vets will do all they can in these situations to avoid euthanasia, including offering evidence-based behavioural advice, referring to accredited pet behaviourists or assisting with rehoming through reputable rehoming organisations, but sometimes these options are not appropriate, particularly where the behavioural issues make it extremely difficult to rehome the animal.

"Vets are not required to euthanise healthy animals at an owner’s request, but sometimes, having carefully considered all options and given the circumstances the pet finds themselves in, it may be in an animal’s best interests to do so."

Euthanasia of healthy animals is the "hidden, tragic cost" of poor early socialisation, he added.

"This is the sad reality of a failure to socialise animals from the earliest possible age – a specific time in a puppy’s development which has a significant impact on their future temperament and behaviour."

Socialisation must begin with the breeder, he said, as he urged would-be pet owners to carry out thorough research on a puppy's birthplace and rearing. Once a new pet is welcomed into the family, he advised working closely with a local veterinary practice on good socialisation during the first year of the pet's life, particularly in the first few weeks.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.