Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

George Eustice grilled on animal welfare
pup
Going forward, the minister said he would like to strengthen the Pet Animals Act 1951 to make it clear that those selling pets online are required to have a licence.
MPs question Defra minister as part of ongoing inquiry
 
Defra's minister of state George Eustice was subject to intense questioning last week as part of the Efra Committee's ongoing inquiry into animal welfare. MPs asked Mr Eustice to explain what action Defra is taking to deal with a number of key issues, including pet breeding and sales, puppy smuggling and sentencing for animal welfare offences.

During the meeting of the animal welfare sub-committee on 12 July, the minister revealed that the number of licences issued by local authorities for animal breeding establishments is in single figures in many cases - but in reality, many more people are breeding dogs.

Mr Eustice made it clear that, in general, he wants to see the current legislation strengthened to bring more breeders within the licensing system, rather than introducing new legislation.

Neil Parish MP, who chaired the meeting, raised concerns about Defra's lack of knowledge when it comes to how many puppy farms and unlicensed breeders there are.

"What I am worried about is that I don’t think Defra knows how many breeding establishments are out there and what is happening," he commented. "I don’t think they are monitoring what the local authorities are doing. I think you are unsighted; I really do. You think there is something going on out there and it is probably more than you know about. But what are you doing about it? That is the bit that I don’t see coming from your evidence, if I could be so blunt."

However, Mr Eustice said he did not accept the "caricature" that Defra is not doing anything or is unaware of the problem. "We have seen the evidence from a large number of local authorities, as I said earlier, about the number of people they have got within a licensing regime at the moment. That led me to conclude that there was inconsistency there and probably a lot of breeders who we would like to be within a system who were not at the moment."

MPs called for a ban on third party pet sales, a centralised list of licensed breeders and a requirement for all breeders to register for a licence. Mr Eustice expressed reluctance to consider a ban on third party sales as this could prove to be "almost unenforceable" and problematic when it comes to accidental litters.

There was a feeling among MPs, however, that a central database for commercial breeders and a legal requirement to include a registration number when selling pets online, would improve traceability and help to tackle the issues with internet pet sales and puppy smuggling from Eastern Europe. Mr Eustice responded by saying the department would look at this, though he pointed out that it is now an offence to sell a puppy without microchipping it, and changes being proposed by Defra would bring more breeders into the licensing regime.

Going forward, the minister said he would like to strengthen the Pet Animals Act 1951 to make it clear that those selling pets online are required to have a licence, even if they do not have a pet shop on the high street. A new condition for getting a licence is being considered, which would require businesses to give purchasers information on how to care for the pet they are buying. Another option put forward is to make the 2013 model conditions for pet vending licensing mandatory for local authorities.

Defra has also consulted on an amendment to the threshold for licensing, so that anyone breeding three or more litters a year is required to have a licence. A new system for licensing, which would exempt UKAS accredited dog breeders from the licensing requirements, is also being discussed.

Mr Eustice said the Ministry of Justice is giving active consideration to a review of the maximum sentences for animal welfare offences. Work is also being done to examine whether police records of animal abusers could be made more accessible to other organisations.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.